Cited by 61Psychedelics and Drug StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Perceived Benefits of MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy beyond Symptom Reduction: Qualitative Follow-Up Study of a Clinical Trial for Individuals with Treatment-Resistant PTSD

Barone, William, Beck, Jerome, Mitsunaga-Whitten, Michiko, Perl, Phillip·2019·Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Abstract

We present select findings from a long-term follow-up qualitative study of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for veterans, firefighters, and police officers suffering from chronic, treatment-resistant PTSD. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted at participants' one-year follow-up after a recently completed phase 2 clinical trial. Available interviews from 19 of 24 participants were analyzed. This qualitative analysis sought to complement, clarify, and expand upon the quantitative findings obtained from the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-IV) and supported by the Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Questionnaire. Pertinent data from interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) methodological framework. We explore prominent thematic elements from participant accounts to better understand the outcomes experienced in this trial. All participants reported experiencing lasting personal benefits and enhanced quality of life that extend beyond quantifiable symptom reduction. We explore a range of treatment benefits beyond symptom reduction to highlight the utility of qualitative investigations of the process and effects of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy. Limitations and challenges encountered in conducting this study are discussed along with recommendations for improved qualitative research protocols in future clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02791072.2019.1580805

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barone, W., Beck, J., Mitsunaga-Whitten, M., & Perl, P.
Affiliations
  • John F. Kennedy University (US)
  • Comprehensive Drug Education Consultants (CDEC), Portland, OR, USA
  • Smith College (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Barone, William
Venue
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Published
2019-03-08
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
199-208
ISSN
  • 0279-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-9777
OpenAlex
W2921718279
Cited by
61
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
River Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy, treatment-resistant PTSD, veterans, firefighters, police officers, long-term follow-up, quality of life, personal benefits, symptom relief, psychedelic therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hallucinogens, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Retrospective Studies, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review