Cited by 439Psychedelics and Drug StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in military veterans, firefighters, and police officers: a randomised, double-blind, dose-response, phase 2 clinical trial

Mithoefer, Michael C, Mithoefer, Ann T, Feduccia, Allison A, Jerome, Lisa, Wagner, Mark, Wymer, Joy, Holland, Julie, Hamilton, Scott +3 more·2018·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is prevalent in military personnel and first responders, many of whom do not respond to currently available treatments. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for treating chronic PTSD in this population. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, dose-response, phase 2 trial at an outpatient psychiatric clinic in the USA. We included service personnel who were 18 years or older, with chronic PTSD duration of 6 months or more, and who had a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-IV) total score of 50 or greater. Using a web-based randomisation system, we randomly assigned participants (1:1:2) to three different dose groups of MDMA plus psychotherapy: 30 mg (active control), 75 mg, or 125 mg. We masked investigators, independent outcome raters, and participants until after the primary endpoint. MDMA was administered orally in two 8-h sessions with concomitant manualised psychotherapy. The primary outcome was mean change in CAPS-IV total score from baseline to 1 month after the second experimental session. Participants in the 30 mg and 75 mg groups subsequently underwent three 100-125 mg MDMA-assisted psychotherapy sessions in an open-label crossover, and all participants were assessed 12 months after the last MDMA session. Safety was monitored through adverse events, spontaneously reported expected reactions, vital signs, and suicidal ideation and be…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30135-4

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mithoefer et al. (2018) showed significant reductions in PTSD symptoms with MDMA-assisted psychotherapy in chronic PTSD.

    “Significant reductions in PTSD symptoms”
  • Trials with ketamine and the trial with MDMA by Mithoefer et al. (2018) had the most important adverse reactions related to physiological distress, but these reactions were temporary and less meaningful than the overall benefits of the therapies.

    “Trials with ketamine and the trial with MDMA by Mithoefer et al. (2018) had the most important adverse reactions related to physiological distress, but these reactions were temporary and less meaningful than the overall benefits of the therapies in which they were used.”
  • In Mithoefer et al. (2018), 85 adverse events were reported by 20 participants, with four serious, three deemed unrelated and one possibly related to drug treatment.

    “85 adverse events were reported by 20 participants, with four of them being serious, although three of them were deemed unrelated, and one possibly related to drug treatment.”
  • In veterans and first responders with chronic PTSD, MDMA-assisted psychotherapy at 75 and 125 mg produced significantly greater decreases in PTSD symptom severity than the 30 mg group.

    “the groups that received 75 and 125 mg of MDMA with adjunctive psychotherapy in a controlled setting had significantly greater decreases in PTSD symptom severity in contrast of the 30 mg group.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mithoefer, M. C., Mithoefer, A. T., Feduccia, A. A., Jerome, L., Wagner, M., Wymer, J., Holland, J., Hamilton, S., Yazar-Klosinski, B., Emerson, A., & Doblin, R.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Feduccia, Allison A
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
486-497
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799742551
Cited by
439
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 1
FWCI
55.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy, MDMA, post-traumatic stress disorder, chronic PTSD, military veterans, firefighters, police officers, first responders, dose-response relationship, psychotherapy, treatment-resistant PTSD, adverse events, suicidal ideation, open-label extension, long-term follow-up, PTSD symptom severity
MeSH terms
Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Police, Treatment Outcome, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine, Young Adult, Firefighters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review