Cited by 14Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Experiences and views of Dutch general practitioners regarding physician-assisted death for patients suffering from severe mental illness: a mixed methods approach

Open access
Pronk, Rosalie, Sindram, Nieke P., van de Vathorst, S., Willems, D. L.·2021·Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, physician-assisted death (PAD) is allowed under certain conditions. Patients who suffer from mental illnesses are not excluded from this practice. In 2018, general practitioners (GPs) performed 20 out of a total of 67 cases of EAS for psychiatric suffering. OBJECTIVE: More insight into GPs' experiences and views with regard to PAD in psychiatry. DESIGN: The data for this study were obtained through a survey amongst 500 randomly selected Dutch GPs and by in-depth interviews with 20 Dutch GPs. SETTING: A survey study and in-depth interviews. SUBJECTS: Dutch GPs. RESULTS: 86 out of 101 GPs found it conceivable to perform EAS in case of somatic disease, and 51 out of 104 GPs found it conceivable in the case a patient suffered from a mental illness only. The main reason given for refusing an PAD request was that the criteria of due care were not met. Reasons for supporting psychiatric PAD related to responsibility, self-determination, compassion, fairness, and preventing suicide. Reasons for not supporting psychiatric PAD were related to the scope of medicine, a perceived lack of experience, uncertainties regarding the criteria of due care and life-expectancy. CONCLUSION: GPs are less likely to perform PAD for suffering from a mental illness, compared to somatic suffering. Some GPs apply an extra criterion of 'life-expectancy' in case of PAD for suffering from a mental illness. Refusing PAD based on a long life expectancy keeps open the possibility of recovery, but may also just prolong the suffering and add to the unbearableness of it.KEY POINTSCurrently, there is no qualitative research on what the views are of general practitioners regarding the subject of physician-assisted death (PAD) for patients suffering from severe mental disorders.General practitioners are less likely to consider a request for physician-assisted death by a patient suffering from a psychiatric disorder, compared to somatic suffering. Reasons for supporting psychiatric PAD related to responsibility, self-determination, compassion, fairness, and preventing suicide.Reasons for not supporting psychiatric PAD were related to the scope of medicine, a perceived lack of experience, uncertainties regarding the criteria of due care and life-expectancy.Significance for the reader: Although allowed in the Netherlands, PAD in case of severe mental suffering remains a controversial topic. We need in-depth information about the actual practice of it to have an informed debate with regard to this subject.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02813432.2021.1913895

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinicians note concern that fluctuating symptoms or treatment response can alter decisional consistency over time.

    “and note concern that fluctuating symptoms or treatment response can alter decisional consistency over time.9 31”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction says mental illness may impair decision-making capacity, and the Results report GPs’ uncertainty about whether a wish to die is well-considered and whether patients may recover (pages not supplied). The paper does not link fluctuating symptoms or treatment response to changes in decisional consistency over time. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinicians report uncertainty in distinguishing suicidal intent from enduring, well-considered requests for assisted dying.

    “Clinicians report uncertainty in distinguishing suicidal intent from enduring, well-considered requests for assisted dying”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Introduction says it can be hard to determine whether a psychiatric patient’s death wish is part of the illness, and Table 3 in the Results records GPs’ uncertainty about assessing whether a wish to die is well-considered. The paper does not specifically describe clinicians distinguishing suicidal intent from an enduring request for assisted dying; its reported uncertainty concerns the origin and assessment of the death wish. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the Netherlands, 20% of medical specialists endorsed MAiD-NT, and about half of general practitioners endorsed it (main reasons: responsibility, self-determination, compassion, fairness, and preventing suicide).

    “In the Netherlands, 20% of medical specialists endorsed the practice, about half among general practitioners (main reasons: responsibility, self-determination, compassion, fairness, and preventing suicide) [27, 38].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]van Veen SM, Weerheim F, Mostert M, et al. Euthanasia of Dutch patients with psychiatric disorders between 2015 and 2017. J Ethics Ment Heal. 2018; 10: 1– 15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pronk, R., Sindram, N. P., van de Vathorst, S., & Willems, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of General Practice, Medical Ethics Section, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Pronk, Rosalie
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Published
2021-04-03
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
166-173
ISSN
  • 0281-3432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-7724
OpenAlex
W3179700870
Cited by
14
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Dutch Right to Die Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
physician-assisted death, severe mental illness, general practitioners, euthanasia, life expectancy, self-determination, suicide prevention, end-of-life care, Dutch euthanasia law
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Euthanasia, Humans, Netherlands, Psychiatry, Suicide, Assisted, General Practitioners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review