The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Osteoblast–osteoclast interactions
Open accessAbstract
Bone homeostasis depends on the resorption of bones by osteoclasts and formation of bones by the osteoblasts. Imbalance of this tightly coupled process can cause diseases such as osteoporosis. Thus, the mechanisms that regulate communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts are critical to bone cell biology. It has been shown that osteoblasts and osteoclasts can communicate with each other through direct cell-cell contact, cytokines, and extracellular matrix interaction. Osteoblasts can affect osteoclast formation, differentiation, or apoptosis through several pathways, such as OPG/RANKL/RANK, RANKL/LGR4/RANK, Ephrin2/ephB4, and Fas/FasL pathways. Conversely, osteoclasts also influence formation of bones by osteoblasts via the d2 isoform of the vacuolar (H+) ATPase (v-ATPase) V0 domain (Atp6v0d2), complement component 3a, semaphorin 4D or microRNAs. In addition, cytokines released from the resorbed bone matrix, such as TGF-β and IGF-1, also affect the activity of osteoblasts. Drugs could be developed by enhancing or restricting some of these interactions. Several reviews have been performed on the osteoblast-osteoclast communication. However, few reviews have shown the research advances in the recent years. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge on osteoblast-osteoclast communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Osteoclast differentiation and activation
Boyle, W. J., Simonet, W. S., & Lacey, D. L. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01658 · Cited by 6,670 · cited 4×
“progenitor cells, and activates the down signaling pathways related to cell growth and differentiation (13).”
BackgroundInfluentialFunctions of RANKL/RANK/OPG in bone modeling and remodeling
Boyce, B. F., & Xing, L. (2008) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2008.03.018 · Cited by 1,844
Yasuda, H., Shima, N., Nakagawa, N., Mochizuki, S.-I., Yano, K., Fujise, N., Sato, Y., Goto, M., Yamaguchi, K., Kuriyama, M., et al. (1998) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo.139.3.5837 · Cited by 1,201
Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST)
Balemans, W. (2001) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/10.5.537 · Cited by 1,147 · cited 1×
“Sclerostin is a protein that is encoded by the SOST gene in humans (52).”
BackgroundSkeletal remodeling in health and disease
Zaidi, M. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1593 · Cited by 1,069
Role of osteoblasts in hormonal control of bone resorption—A hypothesis
Rodan, G. A., & Martin, T. J. (1981) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02409454 · Cited by 982
Kearns, A. E., Khosla, S., & Kostenuik, P. J. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2007-0014 · Cited by 824
Osteoclast–osteoblast communication
Matsuo, K., & Irie, N. (2008) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2008.03.027 · Cited by 780
Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis
Zhao, C., Irie, N., Takada, Y., Shimoda, K., Miyamoto, T., Nishiwaki, T., Suda, T., & Matsuo, K. (2006) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.012 · Cited by 777
Osteoprotection by semaphorin 3A
Hayashi, M., Nakashima, T., Taniguchi, M., Kodama, T., Kumanogoh, A., & Takayanagi, H. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11000 · Cited by 606
Osteoclast-derived exosomal miR-214-3p inhibits osteoblastic bone formation
Li, D., Liu, J., Guo, B., Liang, C., Dang, L., Lu, C., He, X., Cheung, H. Y.-S., Xu, L., Lu, C., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10872 · Cited by 588
Li, Y., Toraldo, G., Li, A., Yang, X., Zhang, H., Qian, W.-P., & Weitzmann, M. N. (2007) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2006-07-037994 · Cited by 520
The role of NFAT in osteoclast formation
TAKAYANAGI, H. (2007) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1402.071 · Cited by 442
The Bone Lining Cell: Its Role in Cleaning Howship's Lacunae and Initiating Bone Formation
Everts, V., Delaissé, J. M., Korper, W., Jansen, D. C., Tigchelaar-Gutter, W., Saftig, P., & Beertsen, W. (2002) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.1.77 · Cited by 411
LGR4 is a receptor for RANKL and negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption
Luo, J., Yang, Z., Ma, Y., Yue, Z., Lin, H., Qu, G., Huang, J., Dai, W., Li, C., Zheng, C., et al. (2016) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4076 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Subchondral bone microenvironment in osteoarthritis and pain
Hu, Y., Chen, X., Wang, S., Jing, Y., & Su, J. (2021) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-021-00147-z · Cited by 577
Self-citationEstablishment and Maintenance of the Macrophage Niche
Guilliams, M., Thierry, G. R., Bonnardel, J., & Bajenoff, M. (2020) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2020.02.015 · Cited by 512
Re-thinking the bone remodeling cycle mechanism and the origin of bone loss
Delaisse, J.-M., Andersen, T. L., Kristensen, H. B., Jensen, P. R., Andreasen, C. M., & Søe, K. (2020) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2020.115628 · Cited by 152
Is osteoporosis an autoimmune mediated disorder?
Iseme, R. A., Mcevoy, M., Kelly, B., Agnew, L., Walker, F. R., & Attia, J. (2017) · Bone Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2017.10.003 · Cited by 56
Zhu, S., Häussling, V., Aspera-Werz, R. H., Chen, T., Braun, B., Weng, W., Histing, T., & Nussler, A. K. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22010053 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, X., Wang, Z., Duan, N., Zhu, G., Schwarz, E. M., & Xie, C.
- Venue
- Connective Tissue Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-03-21
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-107
- ISSN
- 0300-8207 (ISSN-L)
- 1607-8438
- OpenAlex
- W2586409573
- Cited by
- 873
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
