The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feedback: focusing attention on engagement
Abstract
Within many higher education systems there is a search for means to increase levels of student satisfaction with assessment feedback. This article suggests that the search is under way in the wrong place by concentrating on feedback as a product rather than looking more widely to feedback as a long-term dialogic process in which all parties are engaged. A three-year study, focusing on engaging students with assessment feedback, is presented and analysed using an analytical model of stages of engagement. The analysis suggests that a more holistic, socially-embedded conceptualisation of feedback and engagement is needed. This conceptualisation is likely to encourage tutors to support students in more productive ways, which enable students to use feedback to develop their learning, rather than respond mechanistically to the tutors’ ‘instruction’.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Student engagement with feedback, however, has been an under-researched area in L2 writing, although it has been shown to play a pivotal role in learning in studies of evaluation in higher education (Handley, Price & Millar, 2011;Price, Handley & Millar, 2011).”
From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as Price, Handley & Millar, 2011
In the citing paper
“although it has been shown to play a pivotal role in learning in studies of evaluation in higher education (Handley, Price & Millar, 2011;Price, Handley & Millar, 2011).”
From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as Price, Handley & Millar, 2011
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M. E. F., Lave, J., & Wenger, É. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,362
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
Klitgaard, R. E., & Gardner, H. (1984) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324560 · Cited by 13,639
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · cited 1×
“Within the cognitivist literature, engagement is acknowledged to be multifaceted (Bryson and Hand 2007 ; Chickering and Gamson 1987 ), and Fredericks, Blumenfeld, and Paris suggest that ‘engagement is a meta construct’ ( 2004 , 60), with all components (cognitive, emotional and behavioural) encountered simultaneously.”
BackgroundNicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1989) · Biochemical Education · doi:10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0 · Cited by 4,818
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364 · Cited by 2,608
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chickering A. W., 1987, AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3
- Hand L., 2008, Student engagement
- McInnis, C. Reinventing student engagement and the learning community: Strategic directions for policy, research and practice. Keynote presented at the Higher Education Academy Conference. Edinburgh.
- 2009, Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time – Annual results 2009
- Price, M. and O’Donovan, B. Making meaning out of assessment feedback – Getting more than the message. Paper presented at the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Annual Conference – Enhancing higher education, theory and Scholarship. July8–11, Adelaide, Australia.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 441
Gravett, K., & Winstone, N. (2018) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1498076 · Cited by 37
Students tell us what good written feedback looks like
Voelkel, S., Varga‐Atkins, T., & Mello, L. V. (2020) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.12841 · Cited by 42
Promoting student engagement with teacher feedback through rebuttal writing
Man, D., Chau, M. H., & Bei-bei, K. (2020) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2020.1746238 · Cited by 37
Spooner, M., Duane, C., Uygur, J., Smyth, E., Marron, B., Murphy, P., & Pawlikowska, T. R. B. (2021) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2021.1970732 · Cited by 44
Wu, W., Huang, J., Han, C., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101140 · Cited by 45
Schiller, R., Fleckenstein, J., Mertens, U., Horbach, A., & Meyer, J. (2024) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105163 · Cited by 36
To, J. (2016) · Research in Post-Compulsory Education · doi:10.1080/13596748.2016.1226588 · Cited by 36
Computing EducationLiterature Review and Voices from the Field
Blikstein, P., & Moghadam, S. H. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.004 · Cited by 43
Man, D., Xu, Y., & O’Toole, J. M. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1376310 · Cited by 35
Engagement and Challenges in Supervisory Feedback: Supervisors’ and Students’ Perceptions
Bastola, M. N. (2020) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688220912547 · Cited by 35
Gan, Z., Hu, G., Wang, W., Nang, H., & An, Z. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1810628 · Cited by 35
Zhu, Q., & To, J. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.2017403 · Cited by 37
Can dialogue help to improve feedback on examinations?
Blair, A., Wyburn-Powell, A., Goodwin, M., & Shields, S. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.777404 · Cited by 37
Gravett, K., Kinchin, I. M., Winstone, N., Balloo, K., Heron, M., Hosein, A., Lygo‐Baker, S., & Medland, E. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1686749 · Cited by 38
Exploring the dynamics of student engagement with receiving peer feedback in L2 writing
Zhang, Y., & Gao, Y. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100842 · Cited by 39
Toward a Motivation-Regulated Learner Engagement WCF Model of L2 Writing Performance
Tsao, J.-J., Tseng, W., Hsiao, T., Wang, C., & Gao, X. A. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211023172 · Cited by 35
Enhancing Feedback Literacy in the Workplace: A Learner-Centred Approach
Noble, C., Sly, C., Collier, L., Armit, L., Hilder, J., & Molloy, E. (2019) · Professional and practice-based learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05560-8_13 · Cited by 32
Learning Sciences for Computing Education
Margulieux, L. E., Dorn, B., & Searle, K. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.009 · Cited by 33
The Influence of Reasons Approving on Student Motivation for Learning
Pânişoară, G., Duţă, N. V., & Pânișoară, I.-O. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.382 · Cited by 32
Carless, D. R. (2023) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2023.2203472 · Cited by 40
Pearson, W. S. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1285954 · Cited by 54
Lewis, C. M., Shah, N., & Falkner, K. E. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.017 · Cited by 36
Eather, N., Jones, B., Miller, A., & Morgan, P. J. (2019) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2019.1621002 · Cited by 37
Undergraduate students’ perceptions of and responses to exemplar-based dialogic feedback
Tam, A. C. F. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1772957 · Cited by 41
Supporting students’ engagement with teachers’ feedback: the role of students’ school identification
Carvalho, C., Santos, N. N., António, R., & Martins, D. (2020) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2020.1849564 · Cited by 31
Owusu‐Agyeman, Y., & Larbi-Siaw, O. (2018) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2018.1456780 · Cited by 31
Facilitating Students’ Use of Feedback: Capturing and Tracking Impact Using Digital Tools
Winstone, N. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_13 · Cited by 30
Castro, U. E. T., & Báez, C. P. (2023) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2023.2231358 · Cited by 36
Peer and AI Review + Reflection (PAIRR): A human-centered approach to formative assessment
Sperber, L., MacArthur, M., Minnillo, S., Stillman, N., & Whithaus, C. (2025) · Computers and Composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102921 · Cited by 29
Zhang, Y., Yu, S., & Yuan, K. (2020) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1543261 · Cited by 29
How conceptualising respect can inform feedback pedagogies
Zhou, J., Dawson, P., Tai, J., & Bearman, M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1733490 · Cited by 29
Meyer, J., Jansen, T., & Fleckenstein, J. (2025) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102363 · Cited by 35
Attending to Emotion in Feedback
Molloy, E., Noble, C., & Ajjawi, R. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_6 · Cited by 28
Fernández-Toro, M., & Furnborough, C. (2014) · Educational Media International · doi:10.1080/09523987.2014.889401 · Cited by 28
Is Feedback a Waste of Time? The Students’ Perspective
Doan, L. (2013) · Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice · doi:10.14297/jpaap.v1i2.69 · Cited by 28
Teacher Learning and Professional Development
Fincher, S. A., Kolikant, Y. B., & Falkner, K. E. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.026 · Cited by 29
How do pre-service teacher education students respond to assessment feedback?
Grainger, P. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1096322 · Cited by 27
Motivation, Attitudes, and Dispositions
Lishinski, A., & Yadav, A. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.029 · Cited by 34
Feedback engagement of Chinese international doctoral students
Xu, L., Teng, L. S., & Cai, J. (2020) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/0158037x.2020.1718634 · Cited by 27
Falkner, K. E. K., & Sheard, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.016 · Cited by 36
Middleton, T., Shafi, A. A., Millican, R., & Templeton, S. (2020) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1777397 · Cited by 26
Dialogic Feed-Forward in Assessment: Pivotal to Learning but not Unproblematic
Hill, J., & West, H. (2022) · Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal · doi:10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.20 · Cited by 27
Interplay among technical, socio-emotional and personal factors in written feedback research
Chong, I. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1317712 · Cited by 32
Creating shared spaces: developing teaching through peer supervision groups
de Lange, T., & Wittek, L. (2018) · Mind Culture and Activity · doi:10.1080/10749039.2018.1544645 · Cited by 25
Supportive Peer Feedback in Tertiary Education: Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions
Ortíz, D. C., Nogué, L., Serra, T., & Colomer, J. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9040280 · Cited by 29
Translating evidence-based guidelines to improve feedback practices: the interACT case study
Barton, K. L., Schofield, S. J., McAleer, S., & Ajjawi, R. (2016) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0562-z · Cited by 25
Qualitative Methods for Computing Education
Tenenberg, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.008 · Cited by 24
Supporting the uptake process with dialogic peer screencast feedback: a sociomaterial perspective
Wood, J. M. (2022) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2042243 · Cited by 25
Using mobile learning and social media to enhance learner feedback
Ada, M. B., Stansfield, M., & Baxter, G. J. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-07-2015-0060 · Cited by 24
Student Perceptions of Feedback in Higher Education
Glazzard, J., & Stones, S. (2019) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.18.11.3 · Cited by 23
Atif, A., Jha, M., Richards, D., & BILGIN, A. A. B. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823410-5.00013-9 · Cited by 25
Pereira, Í. S. P., Fernandes, E. L., & Flores, M. A. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11080400 · Cited by 27
Haden, P. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.006 · Cited by 28
Baker, S. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1082174 · Cited by 22
Examining the Relationships between Feedback Practices and Learning Motivation
Gan, Z., He, J., Zhang, L. J., & Schumacker, R. E. (2023) · Measurement Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives · doi:10.1080/15366367.2022.2061236 · Cited by 29
Engajamento do estudante no ensino superior como indicador de avaliação
de Martins, L. M., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2017) · Avaliação Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas) · doi:10.1590/s1414-40772017000100012 · Cited by 22
Investigating non-engagement with feedback in higher education as a social practice
Jørgensen, B. M. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1525691 · Cited by 25
Kam, B. S., Yune, S. J., Lee, S. Y., Im, S. J., & Baek, S. Y. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1688-6 · Cited by 21
Feedback engagement as a multidimensional construct: a validation study
Gan, Z., Wei, W., & Yu, G. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2381227 · Cited by 24
Assessment IS learning: developing a student‐centred approach for assessment in Higher Education
Rutherford, S., Pritchard, C., & Francis, N. (2024) · FEBS Open Bio · doi:10.1002/2211-5463.13921 · Cited by 41
Concepciones de profesores sobre retroalimentación: una revisión de la literatura
Pérez, G. C., & Zúñiga, C. G. (2017) · Magis Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación · doi:10.11144/javeriana.m9-19.cpsr · Cited by 26
The Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit (DEFT)
Winstone, N., & Nash, R. A. (2016) · Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) · Cited by 21
Medical students' experiences and needs from written reflective journal feedback
Rozental, L., Meitar, D., & Karnieli‐Miller, O. (2020) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14406 · Cited by 23
Empowering agency through learner-orchestrated self-generated feedback
Wood, J., & Pitt, E. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2365856 · Cited by 24
Carless, D. R., & Young, S. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2389436 · Cited by 20
Bastola, M. N., & Hu, G. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101055 · Cited by 23
Student engagement with teacher oral feedback in EFL university classrooms
Wang, B., Yu, S., Zheng, Y., & Teo, T. P. (2022) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/13621688221105772 · Cited by 20
Eather, N., Riley, N., Miller, D., & Imig, S. R. (2019) · Journal of Education and Training Studies · doi:10.11114/jets.v7i8.4053 · Cited by 22
O’Connor, A., & McCurtin, A. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02914-2 · Cited by 20
Exploring Formative Assessment Using Cultural Historical Activity Theory
Asghar, M. (2013) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.17569/tojqi.66727 · Cited by 20
Hu, G., & Choo, L. L. (2015) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1058591 · Cited by 20
Making learning more visible through e-assessment: implications for feedback
Martínez, M. L., Valdivia, I. M. Á., & Remesal, A. (2015) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-015-9091-8 · Cited by 19
Wolstencroft, P., & Main, L. D. (2020) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2020.1759517 · Cited by 19
Towards effective group work assessment: even what you don’t see can bias you
Gweon, G., Jun, S., Finger, S., & Rosé, C. P. (2015) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9332-1 · Cited by 19
Huang, W.-C. (2024) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-024-00255-3 · Cited by 18
Daumiller, M., & Meyer, J. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102390 · Cited by 23
Noroozi, O., & Wever, B. D. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2 · Cited by 23
Examining pre-service teachers’ feedback on low- and high-quality written assignments
Máñez, I., Lipnevich, A. A., Lopera-Oquendo, C., & Cerdán, R. (2024) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-024-09432-x · Cited by 20
Richardson, J. T. E., Rivers, B. A., & Whitelock, D. M. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.938317 · Cited by 18
Bastola, M. N., & Hu, G. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100962 · Cited by 19
Providing Exemplars in the Learning Environment: the Case for and against
Newlyn, D. (2013) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2013.010104 · Cited by 18
Feedback for student learning in higher education
Carless, D. R. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.14066-7 · Cited by 24
The development and validation of the assessment engagement scale
Evans, C., & Zhu, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136878 · Cited by 26
Expert teacher perceptions of two-way feedback interaction
Tan, F., Whipp, P. R., Gagné, M., & Quaquebeke, N. V. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102930 · Cited by 26
Observational feedback literacy: designing post observation feedback for learning
Heron, M., Donaghue, H., & Balloo, K. (2023) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2023.2191786 · Cited by 17
Máñez, I., Skrobiszewska, N., Tomás, A. D., Cantero, M. J., Cerdán, R., García, Ó. F., & García‐Ros, R. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12993 · Cited by 19
Malmi, L., Utting, I., & Ko, A. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.022 · Cited by 18
Enhancing Feedback Via Peer Learning In Large Classrooms
Ng, H. Z., Hussein, R. M. R., & Saat, R. M. (2016) · Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.52380/mojet.2016.4.1.73 · Cited by 17
Learning Outside the Classroom
Begel, A., & Ko, A. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.027 · Cited by 18
Noche, M. B. G., Serra, V. Q., Ruíz, M. Á. G., & Ibáñez, J. C. (2017) · REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.4995/redu.2017.5991 · Cited by 15
Dieste, S. A., Aranda, A. F., Herguedas, J. L. A., & Martín, M. R. R. (2020) · Retos · doi:10.47197/retos.v37i37.71029 · Cited by 19
Computing for Other Disciplines
Guzdial, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.020 · Cited by 20
On the role of engagement in automated feedback effectiveness: Insights from keystroke logging
Schiller, R., Fleckenstein, J., Höft, L., Horbach, A., & Meyer, J. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105386 · Cited by 14
Lee, J., Kim, R. J., & Choi, H. (2020) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/jdd.12043 · Cited by 14
Exploring the emotions of international students about their feedback experiences
Olave-Encina, K., Moni, K., & Renshaw, P. D. (2020) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1786020 · Cited by 14
Engineering Education Research
Loui, M. C., & Borrego, M. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.012 · Cited by 17
Smith, C. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1733489 · Cited by 14
Partanen, L. J. (2018) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c8rp00074c · Cited by 14
Implementation of Specifications Grading in an Upper-Division Chemical Biology Lecture Course
Kelz, J. I., Uribe, J. L., Rasekh, M. F., Takahashi, G. R., Gibson, W. S., Link, R. D., McKnelly, K. J., & Martin, R. W. (2023) · The Biophysicist · doi:10.35459/tbp.2022.000239 · Cited by 13
Cheng, X., Gao, L. X., & Liu, Y. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103375 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J.
- Affiliations
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Price, Margaret
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 879-896
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2091254070
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 50.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- assessment feedback, student engagement, dialogic feedback, student satisfaction, tutor-student interaction, learning development, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review