The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feedback: focusing attention on engagement
Abstract
Within many higher education systems there is a search for means to increase levels of student satisfaction with assessment feedback. This article suggests that the search is under way in the wrong place by concentrating on feedback as a product rather than looking more widely to feedback as a long-term dialogic process in which all parties are engaged. A three-year study, focusing on engaging students with assessment feedback, is presented and analysed using an analytical model of stages of engagement. The analysis suggests that a more holistic, socially-embedded conceptualisation of feedback and engagement is needed. This conceptualisation is likely to encourage tutors to support students in more productive ways, which enable students to use feedback to develop their learning, rather than respond mechanistically to the tutors’ ‘instruction’.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Student engagement with feedback, however, has been an under-researched area in L2 writing, although it has been shown to play a pivotal role in learning in studies of evaluation in higher education (Handley, Price & Millar, 2011;Price, Handley & Millar, 2011).”
From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as Price, Handley & Millar, 2011
In the citing paper
“although it has been shown to play a pivotal role in learning in studies of evaluation in higher education (Handley, Price & Millar, 2011;Price, Handley & Millar, 2011).”
From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as Price, Handley & Millar, 2011
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M. E. F., Lave, J., & Wenger, É. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,362
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
Klitgaard, R. E., & Gardner, H. (1984) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324560 · Cited by 13,639
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · cited 1×
“Within the cognitivist literature, engagement is acknowledged to be multifaceted (Bryson and Hand 2007 ; Chickering and Gamson 1987 ), and Fredericks, Blumenfeld, and Paris suggest that ‘engagement is a meta construct’ ( 2004 , 60), with all components (cognitive, emotional and behavioural) encountered simultaneously.”
BackgroundNicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1989) · Biochemical Education · doi:10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0 · Cited by 4,818
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364 · Cited by 2,608
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chickering A. W., 1987, AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3
- Hand L., 2008, Student engagement
- McInnis, C. Reinventing student engagement and the learning community: Strategic directions for policy, research and practice. Keynote presented at the Higher Education Academy Conference. Edinburgh.
- 2009, Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time – Annual results 2009
- Price, M. and O’Donovan, B. Making meaning out of assessment feedback – Getting more than the message. Paper presented at the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Annual Conference – Enhancing higher education, theory and Scholarship. July8–11, Adelaide, Australia.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 441
University teachers’ reflections on the reasons behind their changing feedback practice
Wei, W., & Yanmei, X. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1414146 · Cited by 13
Evaluating alignment of student and tutor perspectives on feedback on language learning assignments
Fernández-Toro, M., & Furnborough, C. (2018) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1520043 · Cited by 13
The effects of teacher’ feedback
Rochera, M. J., Engel, A., & Salvador, C. C. (2021) · Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED) · doi:10.6018/red.476901 · Cited by 12
Penn, S., & Brown, N. (2022) · Ubiquitous Learning An International Journal · doi:10.18848/1835-9795/cgp/v15i02/1-18 · Cited by 15
Leveraging the Integrated Development Environment for Learning Analytics
Carter, A., Hundhausen, C. D., & Olivares, D. M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.024 · Cited by 13
Jansen, T., Horbach, A., & Meyer, J. (2025) · Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference · doi:10.1145/3706468.3706494 · Cited by 12
The role of learner engagement with corrective feedback in EFL/ESL classrooms
Liu, H., & Feng, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118467 · Cited by 34
The impact of cognitive and motivational resources on engagement with automated formative feedback
Barkela, V., Schmitt, L., & Leuchter, M. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102234 · Cited by 18
Yang, Y., Yu, A., Li, J., Shafi, M., & Fauzi, M. A. (2024) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-01-2024-0017 · Cited by 14
Liu, T., & Aryadoust, V. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14080725 · Cited by 24
Jarni, N., & Gurr, D. M. (2024) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu3030045 · Cited by 12
Teacher Knowledge for Inclusive Computing Learning
Goode, J., & Ryoo, J. J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.025 · Cited by 12
Modelo de retroalimentación para el aprendizaje: Una propuesta basada en la revisión de literatura*
Cáceres, S. Q., & Tapia, C. S. (2021) · Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa · Cited by 11
An empirical study of student action from ipsative design of feedback processes
Malecka, B., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D. J., & Tai, J. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1968338 · Cited by 11
Supervisory feedback: Supervisors’ reasons for not giving timely feedback
Bahtilla, M. (2022) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2022.2083656 · Cited by 11
Healthcare Students’ Perceptions of Electronic Feedback through GradeMark®
Watkins, D. S., Dummer, P. M. H., Hawthorne, K., Cousins, J., Emmett, C. P., & Johnson, M. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/1945 · Cited by 11
Exploring the impact of feedback on student performance in undergraduate civil engineering
Das, D. K. (2023) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2023.2238188 · Cited by 14
The Impact of Active Listening on Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Educational Settings
Paramole, O. C., Adeoye, M. A., Arowosaye, S. A., & Ibikunle, Y. A. (2024) · International Journal of Universal Education · doi:10.33084/ijue.v2i2.8898 · Cited by 14
McGinness, H. T., Caldwell, P. H. Y., Gunasekera, H., & Scott, K. M. (2022) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2022.2084401 · Cited by 12
Feedback processing and emotion regulation in nursing students during internship
Hausman, M., Detroz, P., Pétré, B., Guillaume, M., & Dancot, J. (2023) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101804 · Cited by 10
Learners’ Feedback Literacy and the Longer Term: Developing Capacity for Impact
Carless, D. R. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_4 · Cited by 12
van Heerden, M. (2020) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2020.1788411 · Cited by 10
Davies, J. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2180617 · Cited by 10
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Watts, F. M., & Shultz, G. V. (2024) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100808 · Cited by 11
Vahrenhold, J., Cutts, Q. I., & Falkner, K. E. K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.019 · Cited by 11
Effects of Temporary Mark Withholding on Academic Performance
Kuepper-Tetzel, C. E., & Gardner, P. L. (2021) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725721999958 · Cited by 14
Dang, B. Y. Y., Ho, E., & Tsang, A. (2022) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-022-00679-w · Cited by 10
Lancaster, T., Robins, A. V., & Fincher, S. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.015 · Cited by 11
Teacher behaviour and student engagement with L2 writing feedback: a case study
Luo, N. (2023) · IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching · doi:10.1515/iral-2023-0132 · Cited by 8
Playfoot, D. R., Horry, R., & Pink, A. E. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2373799 · Cited by 8
Liu, Z., Yu, R., Yao, X., & Yan, Q. (2025) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106689 · Cited by 10
Unheard and unused: why students reject teacher and peer feedback
Lipnevich, A. A., Lopera-Oquendo, C., Tomazin, L., Gutterman, J., & Florentin, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1567704 · Cited by 8
Yang, L. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221094604 · Cited by 8
Kaur, D., Negi, G., Jain, A., Meinia, S. K., Sidhu, T. K., & Bhandari, B. (2022) · Asian Journal of Transfusion Science · doi:10.4103/ajts.ajts_127_21 · Cited by 8
Pittaway, S. M., & Dowden, T. (2014) · Studying Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/17425964.2014.949659 · Cited by 8
Maximising Student Success with Automatic Formative Feedback for Both Teachers and Students
Whitelock, D. M. (2015) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27704-2_14 · Cited by 8
Learning-oriented assessment in action: impact on students of physics for engineering
Pérez, O. E. G., & Treviño, J. P. (2019) · International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) · doi:10.1007/s12008-019-00606-2 · Cited by 8
Haden, P. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.007 · Cited by 10
Academics’ perception of final examinations in engineering education
Gratchev, I., Howell, S., & Stegen, S. (2023) · Australasian journal of engineering education · doi:10.1080/22054952.2023.2284484 · Cited by 10
Computing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7
Formative Assessment and Feedback Strategies
Narciss, S., & Zumbach, J. (2022) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28745-0_63 · Cited by 8
Li, K., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Hu, W. W. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09690-8 · Cited by 8
Zhu, S., Li, Q. H., Yao, Y., Li, J., & Zhu, X. (2025) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100960 · Cited by 12
Development and evaluation of two interventions to improve students’ reflection on feedback
Harris, R. J., Blundell-Birtill, P., & Pownall, M. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2107999 · Cited by 7
Identifying competent problem posers and exploring their characteristics
Zhang, L., Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2023) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101086 · Cited by 9
Simão, A. M. V., Flores, M. A., Barros, A., Fernandes, S. R. G., & Mesquita, D. (2015) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2014.996408 · Cited by 7
Shephard, K. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.011 · Cited by 8
Student Knowledge and Misconceptions
Lewis, C. M., Clancy, M. J., & Vahrenhold, J. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.028 · Cited by 7
Shapiro, R. B., & Tissenbaum, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.021 · Cited by 9
Turner, E. (2021) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2021.1941216 · Cited by 10
Liu, T., Aryadoust, V., & ARYADOUST (2022) · Studies in Language Assessment · doi:10.58379/mtum3193 · Cited by 10
Sánchez, H. S., & Rodrigues, L. D. A. D. (2024) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101370 · Cited by 9
Curtis, K., Chong, S. W., & Kong, M. S. (2025) · Research Synthesis in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1080/29984475.2025.2495271 · Cited by 9
La retroalimentación formativa como estrategia para mejorar el desempeño en el aula
Moya-Muñoz, L. D., Lopez-Velez, C. R., Pérez-Marquin, J. M., & Cedeño-León, M. M. (2025) · Revista Científica Zambos. · doi:10.69484/rcz/v4/n2/118 · Cited by 6
Taole, M. J. (2022) · South African Journal of Education · doi:10.15700/saje.v42n4a2145 · Cited by 6
Gan, Z., & Wang, X. (2024) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2023-0136 · Cited by 7
Máñez, I., Serrano-Mendizábal, M., Tomás, A. D., & García-Ros, R. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00510-8 · Cited by 7
Employing a Classroom Response System to Teach Law: A Case Study
Easton, C. (2012) · European journal of law and technology · Cited by 6
Ko, A. J., & Fincher, S. A. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.005 · Cited by 7
Fostering Students' ‘Use My Own Device' Attitude
Ada, M. B. (2014) · International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing · doi:10.4018/ijtem.2014010102 · Cited by 6
The Significance of Assignment Feedback: From Consumption to Construction
Blair, A., Curtis, S., Goodwin, M., & Shields, S. (2012) · European Political Science · doi:10.1057/eps.2012.40 · Cited by 6
MyFeedBack: An interactive mobile Web 2.0 system for formative assessment and feedback
Ada, M. B. (2013) · International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education · doi:10.1109/icelete.2013.6644355 · Cited by 6
An infographic to support students' self-regulated learning
Ott, C., Robins, A. V., & Shephard, K. L. (2014) · Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/2674683.2674705 · Cited by 6
Students As Teachers and Communicators
Simon, B., Hundhausen, C. D., McDowell, C., Werner, L., Hu, H. H., & Kussmaul, C. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.030 · Cited by 6
Feedback and Feedforward as a Dialogic Communication in the Learning Environment
Harro‐Loit, H. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.89645 · Cited by 6
¿Cómo implicar a los estudiantes para que utilicen el feedback online?
Espasa, A., & Guasch, T. (2021) · RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia · doi:10.5944/ried.24.2.29107 · Cited by 9
The what, when & how factors: reflections on classroom assessment in the service of inquiry
Cowie, B., & Harrison, C. A. (2020) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1824088 · Cited by 6
Fincher, S. A., & Robins, A. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.001 · Cited by 9
Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.09013-8 · Cited by 6
Lloyd, M., Bennett, N., Wilkinson, A., Furlong, N. J., Cardwell, J., & Michaels, S. (2021) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.03.007 · Cited by 6
English Education Master Students' Perceptions on Peer Feedback in Academic Writing
Wijaya, K. F. (2022) · Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning · doi:10.18196/ftl.v7i1.12751 · Cited by 11
Riese, E., & Bälter, O. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3517134 · Cited by 5
Haas, B., Lavicza, Z., & Kreis, Y. (2022) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.58459/rptel.2023.18013 · Cited by 5
An exploratory field study of students’ memory for written feedback comments
Winstone, N., & Nash, R. A. (2024) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2024.2367029 · Cited by 6
Student Experiences With Peer Review and Revision for Writing-to-Learn in a Chemistry Course Context
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Milne, S. L., Petterson, M. N., Chen, J., & Shultz, G. V. (2024) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/07410883241263542 · Cited by 13
A Case Study of Qualitative Methods
Lewis, C. M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.032 · Cited by 14
Formative Assessment and Feedback Strategies
Narciss, S., & Zumbach, J. (2022) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26248-8_63-1 · Cited by 7
Authentic Assessment in Higher Education: Applying a Habermasian Framework
Lean, G., & Barber, W. (2022) · European Conference on e-Learning · doi:10.34190/ecel.21.1.913 · Cited by 5
Howard, E., Meehan, M., & Parnell, A. C. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1476670 · Cited by 5
Evaluation of Lecturer’s Feedback in Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise Assessment (Mini-CEX)
Besar, M. N. A., Kamruddin, M. A., Siraj, H. H., Yaman, M. N., Bujang, S. M., Karim, J., & Jaafar, A. S. (2019) · Education in Medicine Journal · doi:10.21315/eimj2018.10.4.4 · Cited by 5
Examining Cognitive Empathy Elements within AI Chatbots for Healthcare Systems
Alam, L. (2022) · doi:10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/1437 · Cited by 6
van Heerden, M., & Bharuthram, S. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2024.2437114 · Cited by 4
Orsmond, P., Young, N., & Zvauya, R. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2428164 · Cited by 5
A Thematic Analysis of Factors Influencing Student’s Peer-Feedback Orientation
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., & Kalz, M. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_12 · Cited by 4
Potential impact on student autonomy through the organization of feedback
CHERNOBAY, E. V., & Kholmanskaia, M. V. (2023) · Педагогика и психология образования · doi:10.31862/2500-297x-2023-2-23-43 · Cited by 4
Bowman, M., & Addyman, B. (2014) · Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education · doi:10.47408/jldhe.v0i7.241 · Cited by 4
A Case Study of Peer Instruction
Porter, L., & Simon, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.031 · Cited by 4
Presentation and Evaluation of a New Graduate Unit of Study in Engineering Product Development
Bodisco, T. A., & Palmer, S. R. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145749 · Cited by 4
Lancaster, G. L. J., Bayless, S. J., & Punia, R. (2020) · Psychology Teaching Review · doi:10.53841/bpsptr.2020.26.2.26 · Cited by 4
Olave-Encina, K. (2019) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1698063 · Cited by 4
Congruencias y discrepancias entre concepciones y prácticas evaluativas con uso de TIC
Romero, L. L. M., & Rochera, M. J. (2015) · Perspectiva educacional · doi:10.4151/07189729-vol.54-iss.2-art.354 · Cited by 4
Sherwood, C., & Kwak, D. W. (2017) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2017.1332750 · Cited by 4
Remediation theory and practice : transforming at-risk medical students
Winston, K. (2013) · doi:10.26481/dis.20131212kw · Cited by 4
Taguba, H., & Plata, S. M. (2025) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-025-00362-z · Cited by 3
Mai, H. (2025) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.70046 · Cited by 10
Zhan, Y. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2546347 · Cited by 3
Perceptions of feedback: the use of self-reflection to improve student satisfaction
Sullivan, S., Gaydon, M., Panton, S., Nguyen, X. H., & Richardson, J. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2572034 · Cited by 4
Guo, Q., & Xu, Y. (2025) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-025-00996-w · Cited by 3
Keller, M. V., Daumiller, M. H., & Dresel, M. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102152 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J.
- Affiliations
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Price, Margaret
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 879-896
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2091254070
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 50.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- assessment feedback, student engagement, dialogic feedback, student satisfaction, tutor-student interaction, learning development, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
