The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feedback: focusing attention on engagement
Abstract
Within many higher education systems there is a search for means to increase levels of student satisfaction with assessment feedback. This article suggests that the search is under way in the wrong place by concentrating on feedback as a product rather than looking more widely to feedback as a long-term dialogic process in which all parties are engaged. A three-year study, focusing on engaging students with assessment feedback, is presented and analysed using an analytical model of stages of engagement. The analysis suggests that a more holistic, socially-embedded conceptualisation of feedback and engagement is needed. This conceptualisation is likely to encourage tutors to support students in more productive ways, which enable students to use feedback to develop their learning, rather than respond mechanistically to the tutors’ ‘instruction’.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Student engagement with feedback, however, has been an under-researched area in L2 writing, although it has been shown to play a pivotal role in learning in studies of evaluation in higher education (Handley, Price & Millar, 2011;Price, Handley & Millar, 2011).”
From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as Price, Handley & Millar, 2011
In the citing paper
“although it has been shown to play a pivotal role in learning in studies of evaluation in higher education (Handley, Price & Millar, 2011;Price, Handley & Millar, 2011).”
From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as Price, Handley & Millar, 2011
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M. E. F., Lave, J., & Wenger, É. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,362
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
Klitgaard, R. E., & Gardner, H. (1984) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324560 · Cited by 13,639
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · cited 1×
“Within the cognitivist literature, engagement is acknowledged to be multifaceted (Bryson and Hand 2007 ; Chickering and Gamson 1987 ), and Fredericks, Blumenfeld, and Paris suggest that ‘engagement is a meta construct’ ( 2004 , 60), with all components (cognitive, emotional and behavioural) encountered simultaneously.”
BackgroundNicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1989) · Biochemical Education · doi:10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0 · Cited by 4,818
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1998) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079812331380364 · Cited by 2,608
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Chickering A. W., 1987, AAHE Bulletin, 39, 3
- Hand L., 2008, Student engagement
- McInnis, C. Reinventing student engagement and the learning community: Strategic directions for policy, research and practice. Keynote presented at the Higher Education Academy Conference. Edinburgh.
- 2009, Assessment for improvement: Tracking student engagement over time – Annual results 2009
- Price, M. and O’Donovan, B. Making meaning out of assessment feedback – Getting more than the message. Paper presented at the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Annual Conference – Enhancing higher education, theory and Scholarship. July8–11, Adelaide, Australia.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 · Cited by 2,428
“Students need motivating and guiding as they learn to navigate opportunities to use feedback (Price, Handley, and Millar 2011).”
InfluentialRethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518 · Cited by 966
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 · Cited by 884
Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
Zhang, Z. (., & Hyland, K. (2018) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004 · Cited by 546
Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy
Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2023) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372 · Cited by 603
The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes
Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154 · Cited by 414
Researching feedback dialogue: an interactional analysis approach
Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. J. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863 · Cited by 364
Feedback loops and the longer-term: towards feedback spirals
Carless, D. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108 · Cited by 328
The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education
Winstone, N., & Boud, D. J. (2020) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687 · Cited by 369
Feedback on feedback practice: perceptions of students and academics
Mulliner, E., & Tucker, M. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365 · Cited by 261
A Review of Feedback Models and Theories: Descriptions, Definitions, and Conclusions
Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.720195 · Cited by 368
Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective
Chong, S. W. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765 · Cited by 276
Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach
Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2021) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586 · Cited by 351
Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue
Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. J. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128 · Cited by 207
The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545 · Cited by 207
Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework
Yu, S., & Liu, C. (2021) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100525 · Cited by 193
Novice Programmers and Introductory Programming
Robins, A. V. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.013 · Cited by 191
Moving feedback forward: theory to practice
Orsmond, P., Maw, S. J., Park, J. R., Gomez, S., & Crook, A. C. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.625472 · Cited by 164
Zhan, Y., & Yan, Z. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2471821 · Cited by 162
Dialogic feedback and potentialities for student learning
Steen-Utheim, A. T., & Wittek, A. L. (2017) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002 · Cited by 190
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410 · Cited by 177
Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment
Hill, J., & West, H. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908 · Cited by 196
Effectiveness of Performance Management System for Employee Performance Through Engagement
Awan, S. H., Habib, N., Akhtar, C. S., & Naveed, S. (2020) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244020969383 · Cited by 196
Xu, Y., & Carless, D. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759 · Cited by 140
Responsibility-Sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback
Nash, R. A., & Winstone, N. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519 · Cited by 140
Esterhazy, R., & Damşa, C. I. (2017) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249 · Cited by 139
From feedback to revisions: Effects of feedback features and perceptions
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101826 · Cited by 147
Winstone, N., Boud, D. J., Dawson, P., & Heron, M. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1902467 · Cited by 141
The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research
Fincher, S., Robins, A. V., Margulieux, L. E., Morrison, B. B., Shephard, K., Loui, M., Borrego, M., Lancaster, T., Falkner, K., Sheard, J., et al. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555 · Cited by 141
Gan, Z., An, Z., & Liu, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697045 · Cited by 182
Carless, D. R. (2019) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1684455 · Cited by 123
Lim, L.-A., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Pardo, A., Fudge, A., & Gentili, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1782831 · Cited by 113
Building Feedback Literacy: Students’ Perceptions of the Developing Engagement With Feedback Toolkit
Winstone, N., Mathlin, G., & Nash, R. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00039 · Cited by 131
Translating Principles of Effective Feedback for Students into the CS1 Context
Ott, C., Robins, A. V., & Shephard, K. L. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/2737596 · Cited by 113
Monteiro, V., Carvalho, C., & Santos, N. N. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.661736 · Cited by 97
Feedback that works: a realist review of feedback interventions for written tasks
Ajjawi, R., Kent, F., Broadbent, J., Tai, J. H.-M., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. (2022) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2021.1894115 · Cited by 91
Wood, J. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1914544 · Cited by 108
Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment
Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Valdivia, I. M. Á., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835772 · Cited by 89
Deficiencies of Traditional Grading Systems and Recommendations for the Future
Cain, J. J., Medina, M. S., Romanelli, F., & Persky, A. M. (2021) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe8850 · Cited by 108
A dialogic technology-mediated model of feedback uptake and literacy
Wood, J. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1852174 · Cited by 96
Yu, S. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1742872 · Cited by 85
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160 · Cited by 78
Cao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001 · Cited by 83
Chinese EFL Teachers’ Writing Assessment Feedback Literacy: A Scale Development and Validation Study
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., Pan, Z., & Ghiasvand, F. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100726 · Cited by 90
Curzon, P., Bell, T., Waite, J., & Dorling, M. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.018 · Cited by 85
Deeley, S. J., Fischbacher-Smith, M., Karadzhov, D., & Koristashevskaya, E. (2019) · Higher Education Pedagogies · doi:10.1080/23752696.2019.1644659 · Cited by 76
‘It all just clicked’: a longitudinal perspective on transitions within university
Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., & McCune, V. (2014) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.942271 · Cited by 89
"Check the Grade, Log Out": Students' Engagement with Feedback in Learning Management Systems
Winstone, N., Bourne, J., Medland, E., Niculescu, I., & Rees, R. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1787331 · Cited by 73
Chan, C. K. Y., & Luo, J. J. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1888074 · Cited by 87
Self-regulation and student engagement with feedback: The case of Chinese EFL student writers
Yang, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2023) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101226 · Cited by 86
Effects of EFL Learners’ L2 Writing Self-efficacy on Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback
Tsao, J.-J. (2021) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00591-9 · Cited by 102
Winstone, N., & Boud, D. J. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1532985 · Cited by 89
Structural validity and invariance of the Feedback Perceptions Questionnaire
Strijbos, J.-W., Pat‐El, R., & Narciss, S. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100980 · Cited by 87
Chang, D., Hwang, G., Chang, S., & Wang, S. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10062-z · Cited by 78
Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. P. (2012) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.697868 · Cited by 68
Zhang, Z. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1933900 · Cited by 86
Written feedback in intercultural doctoral supervision: a case study
Xu, L. (2016) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1237483 · Cited by 65
Programming Paradigms and Beyond
Krishnamurthi, S., & Fisler, K. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.014 · Cited by 69
Espasa, A., Saíz, R. M. M., Guasch, T., & Melo, M. M. (2019) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787419891307 · Cited by 68
Walker, M. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.898737 · Cited by 64
360 degree feedback: an integrative framework for learning and assessment
Tee, D. D., & Ahmed, P. K. (2014) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.901961 · Cited by 75
Horn, M., & Bers, M. U. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.023 · Cited by 63
What Feedback do Students Want?
Blair, A., Curtis, S., Goodwin, M., & Shields, S. (2012) · Politics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01446.x · Cited by 62
Cheng, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2024) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101337 · Cited by 62
Educators’ perceptions of responsibility-sharing in feedback processes
Winstone, N., Pitt, E., & Nash, R. A. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1748569 · Cited by 64
Gan, Z., Liu, F., & Nang, H. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13050428 · Cited by 80
McLean, A., Bond, C. H., & Nicholson, H. D. (2014) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.855718 · Cited by 59
Thanh Pham, T. H., & Renshaw, P. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.886325 · Cited by 58
The History of Computing Education Research
Guzdial, M., & du Boulay, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.002 · Cited by 66
Perception of online feedback and its impact on cognitive and emotional engagement with feedback
Saíz, R. M. M., Espasa, A., Guasch, T., & Melo, M. M. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-10948-2 · Cited by 67
Students’ perception of teachers’ two-way feedback interactions that impact learning
Tan, F., Whipp, P. R., Gagné, M., & Quaquebeke, N. V. (2018) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-018-9473-7 · Cited by 73
Exploring students' sensemaking of learning analytics dashboards
Lim, L.-A., Dawson, S., Joksimovíc, S., & Gašević, D. (2019) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3303772.3303804 · Cited by 56
Student engagement: three models for its investigation
Payne, L. (2019) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2017.1391186 · Cited by 55
What makes good feedback good?
O’Donovan, B. M., den Outer, B., Price, M., & Lloyd, A. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1630812 · Cited by 55
Self-citationLearning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179 · Cited by 56
A review of educational dialogue strategies to improve academic writing skills
Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., & Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2018) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787418810663 · Cited by 49
Identifying predictors of students’ perception of and engagement with assessment feedback
Ali, N., Ahmed, L., & Rose, S. E. (2017) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787417735609 · Cited by 56
Understanding Learning and Learning Design in MOOCs: A Measurement-Based Interpretation
Milligan, S., & Griffin, P. (2016) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2016.32.5 · Cited by 47
Practising what we preach: towards a student-centred definition of feedback
Scott, S. V. (2013) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.827639 · Cited by 60
Twelve tips for developing feedback literacy in health professions learners
Tripodi, N., Feehan, J., Wospil, R., & Vaughan, B. (2020) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2020.1839035 · Cited by 44
Using learner-centred feedback design to promote students’ engagement with feedback
To, J. (2021) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2021.1882403 · Cited by 55
Steen-Utheim, A. T., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1476669 · Cited by 64
The art of questioning in online learning environments: the potentialities of feedback in writing
Guasch, T., Espasa, A., & Melo, M. M. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1479373 · Cited by 46
Students’ perceptions of the peer-feedback experience in MOOCs
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., Löhr, A., Klemke, R., Antonaci, A., & Kalz, M. (2021) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2020.1869522 · Cited by 51
Ott, C., Robins, A. V., Haden, P., & Shephard, K. L. (2015) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2015.1033129 · Cited by 43
Enabling feedback seeking, agency and uptake through dialogic screencast feedback
Wood, J. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2089973 · Cited by 44
Zhan, Y. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1557105 · Cited by 40
Xu, L., & Hu, J. (2019) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1593214 · Cited by 41
Ready, willing and able: a model to explain successful use of feedback
Garino, A. (2019) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-019-09924-2 · Cited by 49
Crimmins, G., Nash, G., Oprescu, F., Liebergreen, M., Turley, J., Bond, R., & Dayton, J. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.986644 · Cited by 41
Fostering student motivation and engagement with feedback through ipsative processes
Malecka, B., & Boud, D. J. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.1928061 · Cited by 55
Gan, Z. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00496 · Cited by 56
Nordic Educational Research Association (2024) · Nordic Studies in Education · doi:10.18261/issn.1891-5949 · Cited by 40
Feedback literacy-as-event: relationality, space and temporality in feedback encounters
Gravett, K., & Carless, D. R. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2189162 · Cited by 44
Cognitive Sciences for Computing Education
Robins, A. V., Margulieux, L. E., & Morrison, B. B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.010 · Cited by 44
Song, B. K. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2042187 · Cited by 42
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2012) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0046-9 · Cited by 38
Referencing and empowerment: exploring barriers to agency in the higher education student experience
Gravett, K., & Kinchin, I. M. (2018) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1541883 · Cited by 38
An educational intervention to increase student engagement in feedback
McGinness, H. T., Caldwell, P. H. Y., Gunasekera, H., & Scott, K. M. (2020) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2020.1804055 · Cited by 42
Engaging with multiple sources of feedback in academic writing: postgraduate students’ perspectives
Xu, L., & Zhang, T. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2161089 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J.
- Affiliations
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Price, Margaret
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 879-896
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2091254070
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 50.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- assessment feedback, student engagement, dialogic feedback, student satisfaction, tutor-student interaction, learning development, higher education assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review