Cited by 50Sleep and related disordersSmoking Behavior and CessationObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Gender and the Association of Smoking with Sleep Quantity and Quality in American Adults

Mehari, Alem, Weir, Nargues A., Gillum, Richard F.·2014·Women & Health

Abstract

Smoking and gender are known risk factors for sleep disorders. Studies of samples from Norway and Japan have suggested stronger associations between smoking and disrupted sleep in women; therefore, we examined, gender differences in the association in the U.S. population. We analyzed data from the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We examined the associations between smoking and self-reported measures of sleep disorders (i.e., snoring, short sleep, long sleep, poor sleep, and health care provider diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing) using multivariate logistic regression with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) as measures of association. We also assessed whether the associations varied by gender using a gender x smoking interaction term. Compared to never smokers, current smokers had significantly higher odds of self-reported snoring (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.56-2.56), short sleep (OR 1.68; 95% CI = 1.35-2.10) and poor sleep (OR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.09-1.74). A dose-response relationship was observed between the amount smoked and sleep symptoms. In multivariate analyses, no significant gender x smoking interaction was observed for snoring, short sleep or poor sleep. Current smoking was independently associated with increased odds of snoring, short sleep, and poor sleep in women and men among U.S. adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03630242.2013.858097

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehari, A., Weir, N. A., & Gillum, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Howard University (US)
  • Inova Fairfax Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Mehari, Alem
Venue
Women & Health
Published
2014-01-02
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0363-0242 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0331
OpenAlex
W1540512872
Cited by
50
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women & Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
smoking, sleep disorders, gender differences, snoring, short sleep duration, poor sleep quality, sleep-disordered breathing, dose-response relationship, women's health, United States adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Sleep Wake Disorders, Smoking, Snoring, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review