The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of the doctoral education environment to PhD candidates’ mental health problems: a scoping review
Abstract
Recent research into the mental health of PhD candidates suggests that their high levels of stress could be caused in part or exacerbated by aspects of the doctoral education environment. However, the particulars of this environment have not been explored in consistent enough ways to provide a clear way forward for universities to respond to this issue. This article presents a systematic scoping review of the recent literature on this topic with the aims of collecting and consolidating the heterogeneous range of findings therein and providing a framework to coordinate further research and inform intervention design. Factors shown by the literature to contribute to stress in doctoral settings are presented, including problems in the supervisory relationship, lack of transparency of university processes, workload, role conflict, financial insecurity and uncertain career prospects. Analysis of the review sample indicates four main themes in this body of literature: shifting ideas about the range of environmental stressors and the relationships between them, a paucity of trialled interventions that target the range of known stressors, a lack of standardisation in instruments used for capturing the effects of stressors and evaluating interventions and finally, a need for comprehensive, agreed upon typologies – to integrate what is known about the issue and prioritise interventions. This article proposes guidelines to address these deficiencies, based on an ecological understanding…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Systematic and narrative reviews highlight additional sample-level moderators, including protective and risk factors35–42. These include financial challenges43, self-doubt44, and social and academic loneliness14,45 as risk factors, and suggest social support, a positive and future-oriented mindset, and self-care14 as potential protective factors.”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“A broader systematic evaluation of other relevant mental health issues remains lacking, including clinically defined syndromes such as social phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), personality disorders, eating disorders, alcohol and drug abuse, and burnout, as well as common symptoms of psychological”
From Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · International Journal of Social Research Methodology · doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 · Cited by 36,742
Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion
Stokols, D. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282 · Cited by 2,763
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008 · Cited by 1,182 · cited 28×
“La Touche (2017) investigated ‘lack of transparency’ as a key stressor.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAppel, M. L., & Dahlgren, L. G. (2003) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313830308608 · Cited by 90
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.28945/3862 · DOI
- Burkhart J., 2014, Journal of Integral Theory & Practice, 9, 55
- 10.1177/0092055X13502182 · DOI
- Hänggi-Niclasse C., 2017, Well-being in Education Systems
- 10.28945/1555 · DOI
- 10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00017 · DOI
- Hunter K. H., 2016, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 35
- 10.1353/csd.2006.0030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3200/JACH.56.2.109-118 · DOI
- 10.1080/02602938.2011.555816 · DOI
- Kaczan R., 2015, ‘It’s (not) all in the mind’: PhD students’ experiences, well-being, and mindfulness
- 10.1108/09654281111161248 · DOI
- La Touche R. A., 2017, Graduate students’ mental health: Departmental contexts as a source of differential risk
- Marais G. A., 2018, International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 10.28945/3948 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0022624 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5402/2012/934941 · DOI
- Rouse J., 2014, Mind Pad/Notes D’idées, 4, 38
- 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.005 · DOI
- 10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3490 · DOI
- 10.1080/09515070601043203 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Too stupid for PhD? Doctoral impostor syndrome among Finnish PhD students
Nori, H., & Vanttaja, M. (2023) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00921-w · Cited by 73
Experiences of neurodivergent students in graduate STEM programs
Syharat, C. M., Hain, A., Zaghi, A. E., Gabriel, R., & Berdanier, C. G. P. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149068 · Cited by 62
Dreisoerner, A., Goetz, V., Frohnmayer, D., Tran, U. S., Voracek, M., & Nater, U. M. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02505-5 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mackie, S. A., & Bates, G. W.
- Venue
- Higher Education Research & Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-12-15
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 565-578
- ISSN
- 0729-4360
- 1469-8366
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review