Cited by 283Nutrition and Health in AgingElectrolyte and hormonal disordersGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Water-loss dehydration and aging

Open access
Hooper, Lee, Bunn, Diane, Jimoh, Florence O., Fairweather-Tait, Susan J.·2014·Mechanisms of Ageing and Development

Abstract

This review defines water-loss and salt-loss dehydration. For older people serum osmolality appears the most appropriate gold standard for diagnosis of water-loss dehydration, but clear signs of early dehydration have not been developed. In older adults, lower muscle mass, reduced kidney function, physical and cognitive disabilities, blunted thirst, and polypharmacy all increase dehydration risk. Cross-sectional studies suggest a water-loss dehydration prevalence of 20-30% in this population. Water-loss dehydration is associated with higher mortality, morbidity and disability in older people, but evidence is still needed that this relationship is causal. There are a variety of ways we may be able to help older people reduce their risk of dehydration by recognising that they are not drinking enough, and being helped to drink more. Strategies to increase fluid intake in residential care homes include identifying and overcoming individual and institutional barriers to drinking, such as being worried about not reaching the toilet in time, physical inability to make or to reach drinks, and reduced social drinking and drinking pleasure. Research needs are discussed, some of which will be addressed by the FP7-funded NU-AGE (New dietary strategies addressing the specific needs of elderly population for a healthy ageing in Europe) trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mad.2013.11.009

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In older adults, renal function is often poor so that renal parameters no longer accurately signal low-intake dehydration.

    “In older adults, renal function is often poor so that renal parameters no longer accurately signal low-intake dehydration (7,225,226).”

    From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    Section 6 says kidney function declines with age and that reduced urine-concentrating ability may make urinary markers of dehydration less useful in older people. The claim overstates this tentative conclusion as renal parameters no longer accurately signaling low-intake dehydration; the passage does not establish that broader, definitive claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Older persons are at increased risk of dehydration for various reasons, and dehydration is related to serious health consequences.

    “Besides malnutrition, older persons are at increased risk of dehydration for various reasons, which is also related to serious health consequences (7,8).”
  • Memory problems may cause older adults to forget to drink and forget that they haven't drunk.

    “Memory problems may cause older adults to forget to drink and forget that they haven't drunk (7)(8)(9)252).”
  • The causes of low-intake dehydration in older adults are varied and inter-related.

    “The causes of low-intake dehydration in older adults appear to be varied and inter-related and have been examined in several non-systematic reviews (7,8,242).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Institute of Medicine, 2004. Panel on Dietary Reference Intakes for Electrolytes and Water. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. National Academies Press, Washington DC, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hooper, L., Bunn, D., Jimoh, F. O., & Fairweather-Tait, S. J.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Hooper, Lee
Venue
Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
136-137
Pages
50-58
ISSN
0047-6374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152164967
Cited by
283
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mechanisms of Ageing and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme (266486, NCT01754012)
  • National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
serum osmolality, muscle mass, renal function, polypharmacy, fluid intake, care homes, healthy aging, morbidity and mortality
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dehydration, Diet, Drinking, Europe, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osmolar Concentration, Reference Values, Risk, Self Care, Water, Prevalence, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review