Cited by 86Muscle metabolism and nutritionThermoregulation and physiological responsesSports Performance and Training

Race Diet of Finishers and Non-Finishers in a 100 Mile (161 km) Mountain Footrace

Stuempfle, Kristin J, Hoffman, Martin D, Weschler, Louise B, Rogers, Ian R, Hew-Butler, Tamara·2011·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if food and fluid intake is related to completion of a 161-km ultramarathon. METHODS: Sixteen consenting runners in the Western States Endurance Run participated in the study. Race diets were analyzed using Nutritionist Pro software. Both total intake and intake by race segment (3 total) were evaluated. RESULTS: Six of 16 subjects completed the race (finishers) in 27.0 ± 2.3 hours (mean ± SD). Non-finishers completed 96.5 ± 20.5 km in 17.0 ± 3.9 h. Overall consumption rates of kilocalories, carbohydrate, fat, and sodium were significantly greater (P < 0.05) in finishers (4.6 ± 1.7 kcal/kg/h, 0.98 ± 0.43 g carbohydrate/kg/h, 0.06 ± 0.03 g fat/kg/h, 10.2 ± 6.0 mg sodium/kg/h) versus non-finishers (2.5 ± 1.3 kcal/kg/h, 0.56 ± 0.32 g carbohydrate/kg/h, 0.02 ± 0.02 g fat/kg/h, 5.2 ± 3.0 mg sodium/kg/h). Kilocalorie, fat, fluid, and sodium consumption rates during segment 1 (first 48 km) were significantly greater in finishers than in non-finishers. CONCLUSIONS: Completion of this 161-km race was related to greater fuel, fluid, and sodium consumption rates. However, intake ranges for the finishers were large, so factors other than race diet may have contributed to the successful completion of the race.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2011.10719999

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stuempfle, K. J., Hoffman, M. D., Weschler, L. B., Rogers, I. R., & Hew-Butler, T.
Affiliations
  • Gettysburg College (US)
  • VA Northern California Health Care System (US)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Stuempfle, Kristin J
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2011-12
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
529-535
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2037796044
Cited by
86
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College (Gettysburg College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
ultramarathon, endurance running, fluid intake, sodium intake, carbohydrate intake, dietary fat intake, kilocalorie intake
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Endurance, Retrospective Studies, Running, Sodium, Dietary, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review