Cited by 41Exercise and Physiological ResponsesThermoregulation and physiological responsesGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Nausea is associated with endotoxemia during a 161-km ultramarathon

Stuempfle, Kristin J., Valentino, Taylor, Hew-Butler, Tamara, Hecht, Frederick M., Hoffman, Martin D.·2016·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

This study explored possible contributing factors to gastrointestinal distress, including endotoxemia, hyperthermia, dehydration and nutrition, during a 161-km ultramarathon. Thirty runners participated in the study and 20 finished the race. At three checkpoints and the finish, runners were interviewed to assess the incidence and severity of 12 gastrointestinal symptoms and to determine dietary intake. Core temperature was measured at the same locations. Runners were weighed pre-race, at the three checkpoints and the finish to monitor hydration status. Blood markers for endotoxemia (sCD14) and inflammation (interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein) were measured pre- and post-race. Gastrointestinal symptoms were experienced by most runners (80%), with nausea being the most common complaint (60%). Runners with nausea experienced significantly greater (P = 0.02) endotoxemia than those without nausea (sCD14 mean increase 0.7 versus 0.5 µg · mL(-1)). There was a significant positive correlation (r = 0.652, P = 0.005) between nausea severity and endotoxemia level. Inflammatory response, core temperature, hydration level and race diet were similar between runners with and without nausea. This study links endotoxemia to nausea in ultramarathon runners. Other possible contributing factors to nausea such as hyperthermia, dehydration and nutrition did not appear to play a role in the symptomatic runners in this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2015.1130238

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stuempfle, K. J., Valentino, T., Hew-Butler, T., Hecht, F. M., & Hoffman, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Gettysburg College (US)
  • San Francisco State University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • VA Northern California Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Stuempfle, Kristin J.
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2015-12-28
Volume
34
Issue
17
Pages
1662-1668
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2212054412
Cited by
41
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
nausea, endotoxemia, ultramarathon, gastrointestinal distress, soluble CD14, interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, inflammation, hyperthermia, dehydration, long-distance running
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Temperature, C-Reactive Protein, Dehydration, Diet, Female, Fever, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Male, Nausea, Physical Endurance, Running, Interleukin-6, Body Mass Index, Lipopolysaccharide Receptors, Endotoxemia, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review