Cited by 22Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guilt Focused Intervention for Family Caregivers. Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Romero-Moreno, Rosa, Márquez-González, María, Gallego-Alberto, Laura, Cabrera, Isabel, Vara-García, Carlos, Pedroso-Chaparro, María Del Sequeros, Barrera-Caballero, Samara, Losada, Andrés·2022·Clinical Gerontologist

Abstract

Objectives A pilot randomized controlled trial study was conducted for testing the efficacy of a novel Guilt Focused Intervention (GFI), that was compared with a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CBI) for caregivers of people with dementia with high levels of guilt and distress. Methods Participants were 42 caregivers who were randomized assigned to the intervention conditions. Results Participants in the GFI showed significant reductions in depression, anxiety, and guilt at posttreatment and follow-up. Participants in the CBI presented reductions in anxiety and guilt at posttreatment and follow-up. Clinically significant change for guilt was found in 62.5% in the GFI and 9.09% in the CBI group at posttreatment. At follow-up, 58.33% in GFI and 12.5% in the CBI group were recovered. Conclusions The preliminary results of this pilot study suggest that caregivers with significant levels of guilt and distress might benefit from an intervention specifically designed to target guilt feelings. Clinical implications A novel and initial intervention approach specifically designed for targeting caregivers' feelings of guilt might have the potential to reduce caregiver's emotional distress.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07317115.2022.2048287

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Balaguer, I., Fuentes, I., Meliá, J., García-Merita, M. L., & Pérez, G. (1993). El perfil de los estados de ánimo (POMS): Baremo para estudiantes valencianos y su aplicación en el contexto deportivo [Profile of Mood States (POMS): Scales for Valencian students and its application in the sport context]. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 4(2), 39–52.
  2. Baztán, J. J., Pérez Del Molino, J., Alarcón, T., San Cristóbal, E., Izquierdo, G., & Manzarbeitia, J. (1993). Índice de Barthel: Instrumento válido para la valoración funcional de pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular [Barthel Index: A valid Instrument for the functional assessment of patients with cerebrovascular disease]. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 28(1), 32–40.
  3. 10.1007/s11920-019-1045-1049 · DOI
  4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  5. 10.1080/13607863.2017.1423029 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/geront/43.4.580 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1080/07317115.2020.17692a · DOI
  8. 10.1111/famp.12643 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/S1041610216001393 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/13607860802343027 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behaviour change. New York: Guilford Press.
  12. 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1177/089826439300500202 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/13607860412331323827 · DOI
  15. 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38890 · DOI
  16. 10.1017/S1041610210000074 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/cpp.2116 · DOI
  18. Losada, A., Montorio, I., Knight, B.G., Márquez-González, M., & Izal, I. (2006). Explanation of caregivers distress from the cognitive model: The role of dysfunctional thoughts. Behavioral Psychology, 14 (1), 115–128.
  19. 10.18869/acadpub.jpcp.5.3.203 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.
  21. 10.1080/13607860701368455 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/13607860412331323827 · DOI
  23. McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1971). Profile of Mood States (POMS). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
  24. 10.1016/j.brat.2013.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Morley, S., & Dowzer, C. N. (2014). Manual for the leeds reliable change indicator: Simple excel(tm) applications for the analysis of individual patient and group data. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds.
  26. 10.1017/S1041610214002476 · DOI
  27. Peña-Casanova, J., Gramunt, N., & Gich, J. (2004). Tests neuropsicológicos. Fundamentos para una neuropsicología clínica basada en evidencias [neuropsychological tests: foundations for an evidence-based clinical neuropsychology]. Barcelona, Spain: Masson.
  28. 10.1002/nur.20013 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/opn.12227 · DOI
  30. 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1176/ajp.139.9.1136 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/geronb/gbt027 · DOI
  33. Romero-Moreno, R., Márquez-González, M., Losada, A., Gillanders, D., & Fernández-Fernández, V. (2014b). Cognitive fusion in dementia caregiving: Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the “cognitive fusion questionnaire.” Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 22(1), 117–132.
  34. 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050754 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1037//0882-7974.7.4.622 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/sim.3632 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Romero-Moreno, R., Márquez-González, M., Gallego-Alberto, L., Cabrera, I., Vara-García, C., Pedroso-Chaparro, M. D. S., Barrera-Caballero, S., & Losada, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Clinical Gerontologist
Published
2022-03-14
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1304-1316
ISSN
  • 0731-7115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2301
OpenAlex
W4220680574
Cited by
22
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Clinical Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (FPU grant FPU17/02548)
  • the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (PSI2015-65152-C2-1-R)
  • the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2019-106714RB-C21)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
family caregivers, dementia caregiving, guilt, caregiver distress, depression, anxiety, cognitive-behavioral intervention, caregiver emotional well-being
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Dementia, Guilt, Humans, Pilot Projects, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review