Cited by 115Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careFamily Support in Illness

Psychosocial challenges and resource needs of young adult cancer survivors: implications for program development

D’Agostino, Norma Mammone, Edelstein, Kim·2013·Journal of Psychosocial Oncology

Abstract

Young adult (YA) cancer survivors have specific needs because of their age and life stage. The authors investigated the challenges and resource needs of YA survivors, exploring the influence of age at diagnosis (i.e., diagnosis during childhood vs. young adulthood) and the diagnosis of a brain tumor. The authors conducted four focus groups with YA survivors (N = 22, age 18-35), treated for brain tumors or other cancers in childhood (mean age at diagnosis ± SD: brain, 10.7 ± 2.86; other cancers, 10.5 ± 3.51) or as YAs (brain, 23.5 ± 4.04; other cancers, 25.6 ± 4.10). Transcripts of audiotaped sessions were coded using thematic analysis. Common challenges across the groups included physical appearance, fertility, late effects, social relationships, and changing priorities. Childhood cancer survivors struggled with identity formation, social isolation, and health care transitions. Concerns specific to survivors diagnosed as YAs included financial independence and protecting parents. Childhood brain tumor survivors struggled with cognitive deficits, limited career options, and poor social skills, whereas brain tumor survivors diagnosed as YAs emphasized cognitive decline, loss of autonomy, and living with an incurable disease. Despite the unique challenges identified, all groups described similar resource needs including peer support, age-specific information, and having health care providers proactively raise salient issues. Young adult cancer survivors have many similar psychosocial and information needs regardless of age at or type of diagnosis that differ from those of pediatric and older adult survivors. With improved survival rates, the small number of YA in any one institution will grow. It will become increasingly important to create comprehensive, age-appropriate YA programs that address overlapping and unique needs of survivors at this life stage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07347332.2013.835018

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D’Agostino, N. M., & Edelstein, K.
Affiliations
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
Venue
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Published
2013-11
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
585-600
ISSN
  • 0734-7332 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7586
OpenAlex
W2005309242
Cited by
115
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosocial Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
young adult cancer survivors, psychosocial problems, resource requirements, childhood cancer survivors, brain tumor survivors, age at diagnosis, fertility concerns, late effects of cancer treatment, social isolation, care transitions, cognitive impairment, peer support, identity construction
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Brain Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Tape Recording, Program Development, Focus Groups, Survivors, Needs Assessment, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review