The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work
Abstract
:A major consideration in designing and adopting new communication technologies is their impact on communication processes and outcomes. One way to understand this impact is according to the principle of interpersonal interactivity.Findings from two investigations are reported here that address how properties of task-related communication conducted with differing interfaces relate to perceptions of interaction partners and the outcomes of their collaborative work. Study 1 manipulated the interface affordances of mediation, contingency, and modality richness. Study 2 examined the affordance of mediation. Results show that interfaces that promote higher mutuality and involvement lead to more favorable perceptions of partners’ credibility and attraction, and those perceptions are systematically related to higher-quality decisions and more influence. Discussion focuses on the relation between user perceptions, design features, and task outcomes in human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
MOON, Y., & NASS, C. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023006002 · Cited by 291
(2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315807645 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity1
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148857 · Cited by 1,511
Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective
Shao, G. (2009) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240910927795 · Cited by 1,162
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00667.x · Cited by 908
Tsai, W.-H. S., Liu, Y., & Chuan, C.-H. (2021) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-12-2019-0200 · Cited by 394
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x · Cited by 400
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., & Miczo, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 33-56
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W1517427952
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518255
- The paper
- Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., & Miczo, N. (1999). Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518255
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
