The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work
Abstract
:A major consideration in designing and adopting new communication technologies is their impact on communication processes and outcomes. One way to understand this impact is according to the principle of interpersonal interactivity.Findings from two investigations are reported here that address how properties of task-related communication conducted with differing interfaces relate to perceptions of interaction partners and the outcomes of their collaborative work. Study 1 manipulated the interface affordances of mediation, contingency, and modality richness. Study 2 examined the affordance of mediation. Results show that interfaces that promote higher mutuality and involvement lead to more favorable perceptions of partners’ credibility and attraction, and those perceptions are systematically related to higher-quality decisions and more influence. Discussion focuses on the relation between user perceptions, design features, and task outcomes in human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication
Kantowitz, B., & Suchman, L. A. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423221 · Cited by 5,299
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596 · Cited by 5,157
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x · Cited by 3,706
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
(2018) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/(issn)1083-6101 · Cited by 1,883
Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication.
Woolgar, S., & Suchman, L. A. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073874 · Cited by 1,604
Handbook of Interpersonal Communication
Knapp, M. L., & Miller, G. R. (1985) · Cited by 1,108
Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction
WALTHER, J. B., & BURGOON, J. K. (1992) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.x · Cited by 996
Self-citation
Cited by
Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity1
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148857 · Cited by 1,511
Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and gratification perspective
Shao, G. (2009) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662240910927795 · Cited by 1,162
McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674 · Cited by 1,082
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00667.x · Cited by 908
Tsai, W.-H. S., Liu, Y., & Chuan, C.-H. (2021) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-12-2019-0200 · Cited by 394
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., Kam, K., & Fischer, J. (2002) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02567.x · Cited by 400
Self-citationInteractivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence
Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Cederberg, C., Lundeberg, M., & Allspach, L. (2000) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00029-7 · Cited by 384
Self-citationThe impact of chatbot conversational skill on engagement and perceived humanness
Schuetzler, R. M., Grimes, G. M., & Scott Giboney, J. (2020) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2020.1790204 · Cited by 357
Chandra, S., Shirish, A., & Srivastava, S. C. (2022) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2022.2127441 · Cited by 315
System design effects on online impulse buying.
Ning Shen, K., & Khalifa, M. (2012) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241211250962 · Cited by 226
Texting with Humanlike Conversational Agents: Designing for Anthropomorphism
Seeger, A.-M., University of Mannheim, G., Pfeiffer, J., Justus Liebig University Giessen, G., Heinzl, A., & University of Mannheim, G. (2021) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00685 · Cited by 200
Yoo, C. W., Kim, Y. J., & Sanders, G. L. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.03.001 · Cited by 152
Lew, Z., Walther, J. B., Pang, A., & Shin, W. (2018) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmy009 · Cited by 86
Bellur, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2017) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12094 · Cited by 69
Ludwig, S., van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., & Friedman, M. (2016) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2016.1205927 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Burgoon, J. K., Bonito, J. A., Bengtsson, B., Ramirez, A., Dunbar, N. E., & Miczo, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 33-56
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W1517427952
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
