The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Makes an ERP Implementation Relationship Worthwhile: Linking Trust Mechanisms and ERP Usefulness
Abstract
To a large extent, trust determines expected utility derived from business transactions where the trusting party is dependent upon others, but lacks control over them. In many instances, this typifies the relationship between clients and an enterprise resource planning (ERP) customization vendor. This exploratory study examines how trust is built during an ERP implementation, and the relative weight of this trust compared with the perceived qualities of the implemented ERP itself in determining clients' assessment that the business relationship with the vendor is worthwhile. The data, collected from companies that were involved in the process of implementing a new ERP with the on-site assistance of a certain customization vendor, show that all three trust antecedents suggested by Zucker's seminal study of trust-- process-based, characteristic-based, and institution-based mechanisms--contribute significantly to client trust. The data also show that client trust in this customization vendor and the perceived usefulness of the ERP both contribute to client assessment that their business relationship with the vendor is worthwhile, showing that both getting the job done and creating a trust-based relationship contribute to this assessment. The implications of the importance of creating trust in ERP implementation and the means of doing how to do so are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Self-citationAn Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251829 · Cited by 6,822
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Ganesan, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800201 · Cited by 6,741
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Cited by
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013
Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · Cited by 2,458
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006 · Cited by 2,025
Self-citationConsumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model
Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.016 · Cited by 1,353
Wu, I.-L., & Chen, J.-L. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003 · Cited by 879
Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use
Nicolaou, A. I., & McKnight, D. H. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0103 · Cited by 682
Do I Trust You Online, and If So, Will I Buy? An Empirical Study of Two Trust-Building Strategies
Lim, K. H., Sia, C. L., Lee, M. K. O., & Benbasat, I. (2006) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222230210 · Cited by 505
TUNG, F., CHANG, S., & CHOU, C. (2008) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.06.006 · Cited by 476
A Research Agenda for Trust in Online Environments
Gefen, D., Benbasat, I., & Pavlou, P. (2008) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240411 · Cited by 482
Self-citationAl-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2899368 · Cited by 435
Decisional factors driving organic food consumption: Generation of consumer purchase intentions
Teng, C.-C., & Wang, Y.-M. (2015) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-12-2013-0361 · Cited by 391
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): a review of the literature
Moon, Y. B. (2007) · International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development · doi:10.1504/ijmed.2007.012679 · Cited by 328
Understanding online shopping intention: the roles of four types of trust and their antecedents.
Hsu, M.-H., Chuang, L.-W., & Hsu, C.-S. (2014) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-01-2013-0007 · Cited by 255
Kim, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240401 · Cited by 250
On the Need to Include National Culture as a Central Issue in E-Commerce Trust Beliefs
Gefen, D., & Heart, T. H. (2006) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2006100101 · Cited by 233
Self-citationSellers’ Trust and Continued Use of Online Marketplaces
University of Arizona, & Sun, H. (2010) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00226 · Cited by 136
Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., & Kurnia, S. (2017) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2017.05.005 · Cited by 131
Nursing students’ behavioral intention to use online courses: A questionnaire survey
Tung, F.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2008) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.09.011 · Cited by 109
The Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers’ Cross-Platform Buying Behavior
Zhang, X., & Yu, X. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592246 · Cited by 103
A framework for addressing the organisational issues of enterprise systems implementation
Ward, J., Hemingway, C., & Daniel, E. (2005) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.04.005 · Cited by 100
Trust across borders: buyer-supplier trust in global business-to-business E-commerce.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Koh, T., Fichman, M., Carnegie Mellon University, Kraut, R., & Carnegie Mellon University (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00316 · Cited by 73
Trust in Cloud Computing: Conceptual Typology and Trust-Building Antecedents
Lansing, J., & Sunyaev, A. (2016) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/2963175.2963179 · Cited by 64
An Analysis of Factors Affecting User Acceptance of ERP Systems in the United States
Bandyopadhyay, K., & Barnes, C. (2012) · International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals · doi:10.4018/jhcitp.2012010101 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- GEFEN, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 263-288
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W1750852111
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 25.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
