Cited by 9Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Feasibility of a web-based program for universal prevention of anxiety and depression in university students: An open trial

Rith-Najarian, Leslie R., Chorpita, Bruce F., Gong-Guy, Elizabeth, Hammons, Hayley R., Chavira, Denise A.·2022·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

Objective: To examine the feasibility of a self-guided, Web-based program for universal prevention of anxiety and depression in university students. Participants: University students (n = 651) enrolled in the tested program (March, 2016). Methods: The program delivered eight weeks of mental health skills (e.g., behavioral activation, mindfulness). Data was collected online through an entry survey, weekly check-in surveys, and a post-program feedback survey. Results: Campus-wide recruitment emails were the most encountered recruitment strategy (82%). In terms of adherence, the program was initiated by 73% of students and fully completed by 11% of students. There was some evidence of program acceptability (e.g., 71% of students endorsed the program as “useful”). Common qualitative themes further suggested acceptability for some aspects of the program while also highlighting others for revision. Conclusion: Findings support further development of the online program and recommendations are made for improving the platform before future testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.2020.1869749

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rith-Najarian, L. R., Chorpita, B. F., Gong-Guy, E., Hammons, H. R., & Chavira, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2021-02-12
Volume
70
Issue
8
Pages
2519-2526
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
OpenAlex
W3128650122
Cited by
9
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American College Health Foundation (Stephan D. Weiss Student Mental Health Award (# N/A))
  • JPMorgan Chase and Company (Dolores Zohrab Liebmann Fund Fellowship (# N/A))
  • University of California, Los Angeles (Graduate Division Dissertation Year Fellowship (# N/A), Life Science Innovation Fund Award (# N/A))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
online intervention, universal prevention, anxiety, depression, university students, behavioral activation, mindfulness, program feasibility, program acceptability, program adherence, recruitment strategies
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Students, Universities, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review