Cited by 188Digital Mental Health InterventionsStudent Stress and CopingMental Health Treatment and Access

Technology-based interventions for mental health in tertiary students: Systematic review

Open access
Farrer, Louise, Gulliver, Amelia, Chan, Jade KY, Batterham, Philip J, Reynolds, Julia, Calear, Alison, Tait, Robert, Bennett, Kylie +1 more·2013·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are responsible for a high level of disability burden in students attending university. However, many universities have limited resources available to support student mental health. Technology-based interventions may be highly relevant to university populations. Previous reviews have targeted substance use and eating disorders in tertiary students. However, the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for other mental disorders and related issues has not been reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review published randomized trials of technology-based interventions evaluated in a university setting for disorders other than substance use and eating disorders. METHODS: The PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched using keywords, phrases, and MeSH terms. Retrieved abstracts (n=1618) were double screened and coded. Included studies met the following criteria: (1) the study was a randomized trial or a randomized controlled trial, (2) the sample was composed of students attending a tertiary institution, (3) the intervention was delivered by or accessed using a technological device or process, (4) the age range of the sample was between 18 and 25 years, and (5) the intervention was designed to improve, reduce, or change symptoms relating to a mental disorder. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies met inclusion criteria for the present review. Most of the studies (24/27, 89%) employed interventions targeting anxiety symptoms or disorders or stress, although almost one-third (7/24, 29%) targeted both depression and anxiety. There were a total of 51 technology-based interventions employed across the 27 studies. Overall, approximately half (24/51, 47%) were associated with at least 1 significant positive outcome compared with the control at postintervention. However, 29% (15/51) failed to find a significant effect. Effect sizes were calculated for the 18 of 51 interventions that provided sufficient data. Median effect size was 0.54 (range -0.07 to 3.04) for 8 interventions targeting depression and anxiety symptoms and 0.84 (range -0.07 to 2.66) for 10 interventions targeting anxiety symptoms and disorders. Internet-based technology (typically involving cognitive behavioral therapy) was the most commonly employed medium, being employed in 16 of 27 studies and approximately half of the 51 technology-based interventions (25/51, 49%). Distal and universal preventive interventions were the most common type of intervention. Some methodological problems were evident in the studies, with randomization methods either inadequate or inadequately described, few studies specifying a primary outcome, and most of the studies failing to undertake or report appropriate intent-to-treat analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review indicate that although technological interventions targeting certain mental health and related problems offer promise for students in university settings, more high quality trials that fully report randomization methods, outcome data, and data analysis methods are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.2639

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [56]Farnill D A comparison of hypnosis and computer-assisted biofeedback in computer-anxiety reduction Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1985 5 31 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farrer, L., Gulliver, A., Chan, J. K., Batterham, P. J., Reynolds, J., Calear, A., Tait, R., Bennett, K., & Griffiths, K. M.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Farrer, Louise
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2013-05-27
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
e101
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165984366
Cited by
188
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
technology-based interventions, student mental health, tertiary students, university students, anxiety disorders, depression, stress, online intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, mobile health, digital mental health interventions, preventive interventions, intervention effectiveness, methodological quality, effect size, randomized controlled trials, implementation barriers, access barriers, barriers to use, barriers to retention, barriers to adherence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Mental Health, Students, Universities, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review