Cited by 87Mental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSchool Health and Nursing Education

Adolescents’ Reactions to Universal and Indicated Prevention Programs for Depression: Perceived Stigma and Consumer Satisfaction

Rapee, Ronald M., Wignall, Ann, Sheffield, Jeanie, Kowalenko, Nick, Davis, Anna, McLoone, Jordana, Spence, Susan H.·2006·Prevention Science

Abstract

There is a common view that one of the major considerations in selecting between universal and indicated interventions is the marked stigma produced by the latter. However, to date there has been no empirical examination of this assumption. The current study examined reported stigma and program satisfaction following two school-based interventions aimed at preventing depression in 532 middle adolescents. The interventions were conducted either across entire classes by classroom teachers (universal delivery) or in small high risk groups by mental health professionals (indicated delivery). The indicated delivery was associated with significantly greater levels of perceived stigma, but effect sizes were small and neither program was associated with marked stigma in absolute terms. Perceived stigma was more strongly associated with aspects of the individual including being male and showing greater externalizing symptomatology. In contrast, the indicated program was evaluated more positively by both participants and program leaders and effect sizes for these measures of satisfaction were moderate to large. The results point to the need for further empirical evaluation of both perceived stigma and program satisfaction in providing balanced considerations of the value of indicated and universal programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-006-0035-4

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rapee, R. M., Wignall, A., Sheffield, J., Kowalenko, N., Davis, A., McLoone, J., & Spence, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Royal North Shore Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Rapee, Ronald M.
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2006-05-17
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
167-177
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W1970120483
Cited by
87
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
adolescent depression, depression prevention, universal prevention programs, perceived stigma, program satisfaction, school-based intervention, middle adolescence, externalizing problems, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Consumer Behavior, Depression, Humans, Mental Health Services, Preventive Health Services, Stereotyping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review