Cited by 101Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived coercion among patients admitted to acute wards in Norway

Iversen, Knut Ivar, Høyer, Georg, Sexton, Hal, Grønli, Ole Kristian·2002·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Several studies suggest that the patient's experience of being coerced, during the admission process to mental hospitals, does not necessarily correspond with their legal status. Rather, perceived coercion appears to be associated with having experienced force and/or threats (negative pressures), as well as feeling that their views were not taken into consideration in the admission process (process exclusion). We investigated perceived coercion, among patients admitted both voluntarily and involuntarily, to acute wards in Norway. We used a visual analogue scale (the Coercion Ladder, CL) and the MacArthur Perceived Coercion Scale (MPCS), a five-item questionnaire, to measure perceived coercion. Two hundred and twenty-three consecutively admitted patients to four acute wards were included and interviewed within 5 days of admission. Many patients reported high levels of perceived coercion in the admission process, with the involuntary group experiencing significantly higher levels than the voluntary group. However, 32% of voluntarily admitted patients perceived high levels, and 41% of involuntarily admitted patients perceived low levels of coercion. Legal status did not significantly predict perceived coercion on either the MPCS or the CL after taking negative pressures and process exclusion into account. Applying a visual analogue scale (CL) seems to provide a useful measure of patients' perception of coercion and one that largely parallels the MPCS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08039480260389352

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–101 of 101

Metadata

Authors
Iversen, K. I., Høyer, G., Sexton, H., & Grønli, O. K.
Affiliations
UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2002-01
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
433-439
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
OpenAlex
W2090022664
Cited by
101
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Socialdepartementet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
perceived coercion, involuntary admission, voluntary admission, psychiatric hospital admissions, acute psychiatric wards, legal status, negative pressure, patient experience
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Coercion, Female, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Patient Admission, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review