Cited by 50Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health services

Patient Perception of Coercion on Admission to Acute Psychiatric Services

McKenna, Brian G, Simpson, Alexander I.F, Laidlaw, Tannis M·1999·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0160-2527(98)00039-9

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A substantial number of studies reported greater perceived coercion among women.

    “though a substantial number reported greater perceived coercion among women [35,36,45,71,89,94,96,99,112,137].”
  • University graduates had significantly higher perceptions of coercion in three studies.

    “University graduates had significantly higher perceptions of coercion in three studies [45,92,95].”
  • Many studies have found a positive association between perceived coercion and the use of threats, leverage, or displays of force.

    “Many studies have found a positive association between perceived coercion and the use of threats, leverage, or displays of force [41,45,47,48,65,85,162].”
  • Involuntary treatment was associated with an increased risk of the admission being perceived as coercive or procedurally unfair when compared to those receiving voluntary care.

    “Involuntary treatment is by definition associated with objective coercion, but it was also associated with an increased risk of the admission being perceived as coercive (for example experiencing a lack of control or agency) or procedurally unfair when compared to those receiving voluntary care (10,11,15,18–31).”
  • Numerous quantitative studies have found an inverse relationship between levels of procedural justice and levels of perceived coercion.

    “Numerous quantitative studies have found an inverse relationship between levels of procedural justice and levels of perceived coercion [15,24,34,38,42,45,48,54,55,65,92,95,105,107,147,156].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKenna, B. G., Simpson, A. I. F., & Laidlaw, T. M.
Affiliations
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
McKenna, Brian G
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-04
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
143-153
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2222025582
Cited by
50
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
clinical insight, awareness of mental disorder, psychiatric intensive care unit, acute psychiatric hospitalization, Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder, patient perspectives, mood disorders, psychosis, mental health reform, deinstitutionalization
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Zealand, Social Perception, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review