Cited by 145Social Robot Interaction and HRIAI in Service InteractionsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

AI companions for lonely individuals and the role of social presence

Open access
Merrill, Kelly, Kim, Jihyun, Collins, Chad·2022·Communication Research Reports

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) companiosns (e.g., social machine agents, social robots) are becoming increasingly available. Considering that AI companions can be beneficial for individuals seeking companionships or relationships, the social and relational aspects of an AI companion are important to investigate. To understand people’s perceptions of an AI companion, this study examines the roles of social presence and warmth of an AI companion through an online experiment. Primary findings indicate that social presence of a disembodied AI companion fosters greater perceived usefulness of the AI companion and willingness to recommend the AI companion for lonely individuals. Collectively, the study highlights the importance of social presence for disembodied AI companions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08824096.2022.2045929

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social presence gratifications were consistent with prior findings.

    “Social presence gratifications were consistent with prior findings (Merrill Jr et al., 2022)”

    From Intimate Strangers by Design: A Uses and Gratifications Analysis of AI Companionship (2026) · cites this paper as Merrill Jr et al., 2022

    The available copy shows the paper’s title, section headings and links, but no substantive text from the Results or Discussion. Searches for social presence gratifications and comparisons with prior findings found no passage that could verify the claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • AI companions high in social presence and warmth are perceived as more useful and emotionally satisfying, especially for individuals experiencing isolation.

    “AI companions high in social presence and warmth are perceived as more useful and emotionally satisfying, especially for individuals experiencing isolation (Merrill Jr, Kim, and Collins 2022).”

    From Toward an Ethic of Synthetic Relationality: Identity, Intimacy, and Risk in AI-Mediated Roleplay Environments (2025) · cites this paper as Merrill Jr, Kim, and Collins 2022

    The available copy contains the paper’s title, links, and section headings, but no substantive passages from the Results or Discussion. Searches for social presence, warmth, usefulness, emotional satisfaction, and loneliness returned no text addressing the claimed relationship, so it cannot be verified from this copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The appeal of AI agents as companions lies in their consistency and perceived non-judgmentality.

    “The appeal of AI agents as companions lies in their consistency and perceived non-judgmentality [27, 40, 55]”

    From Emotional Coregulation in Close Relationships with AI Agents: A Survey of ChatGPT and Replika Users (2025) · cites this paper as [40]

    The supplied passages and indexed search results contain only the paper’s title, links, and section headings; no substantive passage or page is available. Searches for non-judgmentality and for consistency or reliability found no text addressing either proposed reason for AI companions’ appeal. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merrill, K., Kim, J., & Collins, C.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • St Johns River State College (US)
Corresponding author
Merrill, Kelly
Venue
Communication Research Reports
Published
2022-03-12
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
93-103
ISSN
  • 0882-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-4099
OpenAlex
W4220880657
Cited by
142
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 3
FWCI
21.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communication Research Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
AI companions, social presence, loneliness, social robots, perceived usefulness, recommendation intention, human-AI relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review