Cited by 124Ethics and Social Impacts of AIAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

Away from Trolley Problems and Toward Risk Management

Open access
Goodall, Noah J.·2016·Applied Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

As automated vehicles receive more attention from the media, there has been an equivalent increase in the coverage of the ethical choices a vehicle may be forced to make in certain crash situations with no clear safe outcome. Much of this coverage has focused on a philosophical thought experiment known as the “trolley problem,” and substituting an automated vehicle for the trolley and the car’s software for the bystander. While this is a stark and straightforward example of ethical decision making for an automated vehicle, it risks marginalizing the entire field if it is to become the only ethical problem in the public’s mind. In this chapter, I discuss the shortcomings of the trolley problem, and introduce more nuanced examples that involve crash risk and uncertainty. Risk management is introduced as an alternative approach, and its ethical dimensions are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08839514.2016.1229922

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Asimov, I. 1942. Runaround. Astounding Science Fiction March 29 (1):94-103.
  2. Foot, P. 1967. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review 5:5-15.
  3. Hansson, S. O. 2007b. Risk and ethics: Three approaches. In Risk: Philosophical perspectives, edited by T. Lewens. Routledge: London.
  4. Millar, J. 2014. Proxy prudence: Rethinking models of responsibility for semi-autonomous robots. Proceedings of We Robot, Coral Gables, FL: The University of Miami School of Law. http://robots.law.miami.edu/2014/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Proxy-Prudence- Rethinking-Models__-of-Responsibility-for-Semi-autonomous-Robots-Millar.pdf
  5. Sandberg, A., and B.-M. Heather 2013. Autonomous vehicles, moral agency and moral proxy- hood . Proceedings of the International Conference Beyond AI. Pilsen, Czech Republic.
  6. Thomson, J. J. 2008. Turning the trolley. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36 (4):359-74. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00144.x. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodall, N. J.
Affiliations
Virginia Transportation Research Council (US)
Corresponding author
Goodall, Noah J.
Venue
Applied Artificial Intelligence
Published
2016-09-13
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
810-821
ISSN
  • 0883-9514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-6545
OpenAlex
W2557292748
Cited by
124
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
21.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Virginia Department of Transportation (00107)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
trolley problem, autonomous vehicles, ethical decision-making, crash risk, risk management, uncertainty, ethical dilemmas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review