Tools of the trade: a look at educators’ use of assessment systems
Abstract
Test-based accountability policy in the US has resulted in increased availability and use of assessment systems to support instructional decision making. Though limited, literature to date suggests an important role for these systems as tools, mediating teacher knowledge and action. We examine system log data from NWEA’s MAP assessment to better understand how and when educators use the system, report features valued by educators, and patterns of use at the individual, school, and district levels. Findings reveal limited engagement with the system, occurring primarily around testing windows with a small subset of reports. We describe the features of those reports as well as how those features relate to use across the school year. We also find use is primarily an individualized practice, with little variability in use accounted for among schools and districts. We conclude with implications for research as well as local policy and practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers' actual proficiencies in data-driven decision-making remain relatively low.
“Despite many studies on DDDM, teachers' actual proficiencies remain relatively low.”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Several studies have highlighted the importance of capturing qualitative data.
“Whilst most technology-based systems emphasise numerical data and statistics, several studies have also highlighted the importance of capturing qualitative data (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
The appropriateness of data display increases the likelihood of their utilisation.
“Apart from the quality of data, the appropriateness of data display increases the likelihood of their utilisation (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Query tools and visualisation allow users to execute complex queries and generate customised reports and visualisation based on their requirements.
“Query tools and visualisation allow users to execute complex queries and generate customised reports and visualisation based on their requirements (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021;Rankin, 2016).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Teachers' low level of data literacy is widely documented in the literature.
“Teachers' low level of data literacy is widely documented in the literature (e.g.Farley-Ripple et al., 2021;Hellmuth & Stewart, 2015;Jimerson & Wayman, 2015;Jimerson et al., 2021;van Geel et al., 2017;Wayman et al., 2017).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Teachers' involvement is critical to encourage data use within schools.
“As key users of data systems, teachers' involvement is critical to encourage data use within schools (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
It is necessary to include context-based interpretations and decisions and the link between reporting features and interpretation and use of data.
“Whilst validity issues focus on intended interpretation and use, it was argued that it is necessary to include context-based interpretations and decisions and the link between reporting features and interpretation and use of data (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Despite generally low usage of data systems, teachers access data reports more notably than others, indicating some shared perceptions of usefulness.
“Despite generally low usage of data systems, there are reports that teachers access data reports more notably than others, indicating some shared perceptions of usefulness (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Teachers find that data systems often lack valuable data for DDDM.
“Teachers find that data systems often lack valuable data for DDDM (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
If teachers can make sense of the data and draw insights from them to inform their decisions related to learning and teaching, they are more likely to access the data systems.
“If teachers can make sense of the data and draw insights from them to inform their decisions related to learning and teaching, they are more likely to access the data systems (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
The mismatch between system design and teachers' needs might cause poor system design outcomes.
“This might be due to the mismatch between system design and teachers' needs (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
A technology-based data system that can store, analyse, and display all relevant data, including individual, school, and system data, and quantitative and qualitative data, would increase the likelihood of teachers' use of this system to support their decisions related to learning and teaching.
“A technology-based data system that can store, analyse, and display all relevant data, including individual, school, and system data, and quantitative and qualitative data (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021) would increase the likelihood of teachers' use of this system to support inform their decisions related to earning and teaching (Rankin, 2016(Rankin, , 2014)).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Quality content and visual display are important.
“Building on the adage that data systems are only as good as the data inputted, quality content and visual display are important (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Several studies in this review revealed system characteristics that influence teachers' data use.
“Several studies in this review revealed system characteristics that influence teachers' data use (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021;Rankin, 2016;Schildkamp et al., 2014).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Personal factors that constrain teacher data use include negative perception of the reliability and validity of data.
“These include their negative perception of the reliability and validity of data (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021;Moss, 2013)”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Personal factors that constrain teacher data use include low level of data literacy.
“and low level of data literacy (Farley-Ripple et al., 2021).”
From Using information and communication technology (ICT)-based data systems to support teacher data-driven decision-making: Insights from the literature (2013–2023) (2024) · cites this paper as Farley-Ripple et al., 2021
Cites
Ikemoto, G. S., & Marsh, J. A. (2007) · Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2007.00099.x · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Teachers’ Sensemaking of Data and Implications for Equity
Bertrand, M., & Marsh, J. A. (2015) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831215599251 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2015) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811511700408 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Data teams for school improvement
Schildkamp, K., Poortman, C. L., & Handelzalts, A. (2016) · School Effectiveness and School Improvement · doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Jimerson, J. B. (2014) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.010 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Farley-Ripple, E. N., & Buttram, J. L. (2014) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.006 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationIf You Build it Will They Come? Teachers’ Online Use of Student Performance Data
Tyler, J. H. (2013) · Education Finance and Policy · doi:10.1162/edfp_a_00089 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alonzo, D., Quimno, V., Townend, G., & Oo, C. Z. (2024) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-024-09443-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Farley-Ripple, E. N., Jennings, A., & Jennings, A. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Farley-Ripple, Elizabeth N.
- Venue
- School Effectiveness and School Improvement
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-06-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 96-117
- ISSN
- 0924-3453 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5124
- OpenAlex
- W3035127297
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- School Effectiveness and School Improvement (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- evaluation system, test-based accountability, instructional decision-making, assessment reports, individualized practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review