Cited by 209Educational Assessment and ImprovementTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesStudent Assessment and Feedback

Teachers’ Sensemaking of Data and Implications for Equity

Bertrand, Melanie, Marsh, Julie A.·2015·American Educational Research Journal

Abstract

This article examines an understudied aspect of teachers’ sensemaking of student learning data: the way in which teachers explain the causes of the outcomes observed in data. Drawing on sensemaking and attribution theory and data collected in six middle schools, we find that while teachers most often attributed outcomes to their own instruction, they also frequently focused on supposedly stable student characteristics. By citing these characteristics as explanations for the results analyzed, teachers may have inhibited reflection on their practice and reinforced low expectations for English language learners (ELLs) and students in special education. These findings yield implications for (a) the effectiveness of data use reforms and (b) equity in the education of ELLs and students in special education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0002831215599251

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bertrand, M., & Marsh, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2015-10
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
861-893
ISSN
  • 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1011
OpenAlex
W1955103787
Cited by
209
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 7
FWCI
27.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
teacher sensemaking, student learning data, attribution theory, English language learners, special education students, low expectations, educational equity, junior high school teachers, teacher reflection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review