Cited by 98Educational Assessment and ImprovementTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducational Research and Methods

Thinking about data: Exploring the development of mental models for "data use" among teachers and school leaders

Jimerson, Jo Beth·2014·Studies in Educational Evaluation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.010

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Buy-in and belief in the use of data are important; teachers should believe that the use of data can improve the quality of their classroom practice.

    “Furthermore, buy-in and belief in the use of data are important.Teachers should believe that the use of data can improve the quality of their classroom practice”
  • In several DBDM studies, teachers indicated they were only using data because they felt forced to do so or felt pressured by the accountability system, and not because they believed data use to be important for improving classroom practice.

    “In several DBDM studies, teachers indicated they were only using data because they felt forced to do so or felt pressured by the accountability system (e.g., social pressure), and not because they believed data use to be important for improving classroom practice”
  • In the DBDM studies, data use was often linked to accountability and high stakes testing, and not to improvement.

    “In the DBDM studies, data use was often linked to accountability and high stakes testing, and not to improvement”
  • Data-literate teachers leverage student assessment data to evaluate learning progress.

    “Specifically, data-literate teachers leverage student assessment data to evaluate learning progress (Abrams et al., 2016; Jimerson, 2014; Jimerson & Wayman, 2015; Jimerson et al., 2016; Snodgrass Rangel et al., 2016), to tailor classroom instruction based on data insights (Mokhtari et al., 2009; Poortman & Schildkamp, 2016; Staman et al., 2017; van der Scheer & Visscher, 2018), and to ensure”
  • Within the data-related behavior dimension, there are two distinctive sets of teacher behaviors: data use to enhance communication and discussion with stakeholders, and participation in and engagement with learning about data use and data culture in schools.

    “Within this dimension, there appear to be two distinctive sets of teacher behaviors: (a) teachers’ data use to enhance communication and discussion with various stakeholders such as colleagues (Datnow et al., 2013; Van Gasse et al., 2017), school leaders (Jimerson, 2014; Marsh & Farrell, 2015; Nicholson et al., 2017), and parents (Jimerson & Wayman, 2015; Jimerson et al., 2019); and (b) teachers’”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jimerson, J. B.
Affiliations
Texas Christian University (US)
Corresponding author
Jimerson, Jo Beth
Venue
Studies in Educational Evaluation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
42
Pages
5-14
ISSN
0191-491X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075342510
Cited by
97
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
mental models, data utilization, educational data, teachers, school leaders, educational decision-making, evidence-based practice, data literacy, professional development, school leadership, small school districts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review