Cited by 19Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsReproductive System and Pregnancy

New candidate genes associated to endometriosis

Christofolini, Denise Maria, Mafra, Fernanda Abani, Catto, Michelle Cristina, Bianco, Bianca, Barbosa, Caio Parente·2019·Gynecological Endocrinology

Abstract

A previous GWAS study performed on Brazilian pooled samples indicated some SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) differentially frequent in infertile patients with endometriosis and controls. Some of them were located in the genes whose biological function suggests that they could be associated with endometriosis pathogenesis; thus, the purpose here was to confirm GWAS findings in a larger group of cases and controls in order to associate the results with the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Then, a genetic association study comprising 394 infertile women with endometriosis and 650 fertile control women was conducted. TaqMan allelic discrimination assays were used to investigate the frequency of three SNPs in the genes KAZN (rs10928050), LAMA5 (rs2427284), and TAC3 (rs733629). The analysis revealed a significant association of KAZN rs10928050 (p = .015) and LAMA5 rs2427284 (p = .0059) SNPs with endometriosis-related infertility, while TAC3 rs733629 showed no difference between cases and controls. As a conclusion, it was possible to observe that individual genotyping of a larger sample of patients and controls confirmed the association among KAZN and LAMA5 with endometriosis-related infertility and revealed new candidate genes contributing to the condition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09513590.2018.1499090

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christofolini, D. M., Mafra, F. A., Catto, M. C., Bianco, B., & Barbosa, C. P.
Affiliations
  • Faculdade de Medicina do ABC (BR)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Christofolini, Denise Maria
Venue
Gynecological Endocrinology
Published
2018-07-25
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
62-65
ISSN
  • 0951-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0766
OpenAlex
W2885015422
Cited by
19
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynecological Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundo de Amparo à pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (/3–7)
  • FAPESP
  • Scholarships 2012 Conselho Nacional de desenvolvimento científico e tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
endometriosis, endometriosis-associated infertility, candidate genes, single nucleotide polymorphisms, LAMA5, TAC3, genetic association, endometriosis pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Adult, Alleles, Endometriosis, Female, Genotype, Humans, Infertility, Female, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review