The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Case conceptualization in clinical practice and training
Open accessAbstract
Case conceptualization is central to the success of the therapeutic process. However, integrative case conceptualization research has lagged behind research on integrating therapeutic intervention techniques. A successful case conceptualization provides (a) a dynamic, context-sensitive, yet parsimonious model of the client’s functioning; (b) relevant treatment targets and associated assessment procedures; and (c) a treatment plan including intervention phases and potential obstacles. Success in case conceptualization is a core clinical competency goal for trainees in clinical psychology and a career-long learning goal even for expert clinicians. Emerging technological trends and the formation of adversarial collaborative teams may assist research on the utility of well-constructed case conceptualizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Depression sum-scores don’t add up: why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential
Fried, E. I., & Nesse, R. M. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0325-4 · Cited by 981
The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour
Manstead, A. S. R. (2018) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjso.12251 · Cited by 831 · cited 1×
“Social class impacts thoughts, feelings, and behavior ( Manstead, 2018; Stephens et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf and identity in social anxiety disorder
Gilboa‐Schechtman, E., Keshet, H., Peschard, V., & Azoulay, R. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12455 · Cited by 36
Self-citationCase Mis‐Conceptualization in Psychological Treatment: An Enduring Clinical Problem
Ridley, C. R., Jeffrey, C. E., & Roberson, R. B. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22354 · Cited by 25 · cited 1×
“Formu lating and testing nuanced hypotheses inherent in each conceptualization is an elusive yet important part of the conceptualization (Ridley et al., 2017).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Bailey, R. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2023). Common factors therapy: A principle-based treatment framework. American Psychological Association. · DOI
- Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. Guilford Press.
- 10.53841/bpsrep.2011.rep100 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.044 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jclp.22280 · DOI
- 10.1037/xlm0000668 · DOI
- 10.1002/jclp.22516 · DOI
- 10.14713/pcsp.v9i4.1834 · DOI
- 10.1037/14667-000 · DOI · Paper page
- Eells, T. D. (Ed.). (2022a). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
- Eells, T. D. (2022b). History and current status of psychotherapy case formulation. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (3rd ed., pp. 1–35). Guilford Press.
- 10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.579 · DOI
- Eubanks, C. F., & Goldfried, M. R. (2019). A principle-based approach to psychotherapy integration. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 88–104). Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 10.1080/1047840X.2020.1854011 · DOI
- 10.17759/cpse.2020090302 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.003 · DOI
- Hopwood, C. J., Pincus, A. L., & Wright, A. G. C. (2019). The interpersonal situation: Integrating clinical assessment, formulation, and intervention. In D. Samuel & D. Lynam (Eds.), Using basic personality research to inform personality pathology (pp. 94–121). Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950200015003 · DOI
- Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (Eds.). (2014). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). Routledge. · DOI
- 10.1037/tra0000222 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/int0000160 · DOI
- Kuyken, W., Padesky, C. A., & Dudley, R. (2009). Collaborative case conceptualization: Working effectively with clients in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Guilford Press.
- 10.1002/wps.20888 · DOI
- 10.1037/pst0000462 · DOI
- McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
- 10.1080/07351690.2021.1983395 · DOI
- 10.1027/1015-5759/a000054 · DOI
- 10.1002/cpp.2298 · DOI
- 10.1080/00050060801994156 · DOI
- Persons, J. B. (2008). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy. Guilford Press.
- 10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.014 · DOI
- Persons, J. B., & Hong, J. J. (2015). Case formulation and the outcome of cognitive behaviour therapy. In N. Tarrier & J. Johnson (Eds.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases (pp. 32-55). Routledge. · DOI
- 2021, Moving from tradition-based to competence-based psychotherapy., BMJ Mental Health, 115
- 10.1002/jclp.23362 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/capr.12641 · DOI
- Shedler, J. (2022). Integrating clinical and empirical approaches to personality: The Shedler- Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP). In R. Feinstein (Ed.), Personality disorders (pp. 87–108). Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 10.1186/s40359-019-0337-5 · DOI
- Sperry, L., & Sperry, J. J. (2020). Case conceptualization: Mastering this competency with ease and confidence (2nd ed.). Routledge. · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01234.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.069 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
SEEK: a multicultural framework for teaching clinical case conceptualization
Steele, J. M. (2026) · Counselling Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1080/09515070.2025.2561161 · Cited by 2
Batmaz, S. (2026) · Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy · doi:10.1007/s10879-026-09753-6
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilboa-Schechtman, E.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology in Europe
- Published
- 2024-04-26
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- Special Issue
- Pages
- e12103-e12103
- ISSN
- 2625-3410 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11303933
- OpenAlex
- W4394606676
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology in Europe (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PsychOpen Gold (Leibniz Institute for Psychology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Psychology Archives (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Keywords
- case formulation, clinical psychology training, clinical competence, treatment planning, treatment goals, therapeutic process, clinical psychology practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review