Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Skin substitutes for acute and chronic wound healing: an updated review

Dai, Christina, Shih, Shawn, Khachemoune, Amor·2020·Journal of Dermatological Treatment
DOI 10.1080/09546634.2018.1530443
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Skin substitutes are designed to accelerate wound healing by providing replacement of extracellular matrix and can be used to promote healing of both acute and chronic wounds.Aim: To describe advantages, disadvantages, and indications for different skin substitutes with the intention of providing a systematic framework that clinicians can easily utilize in clinical practice.Materials and method: We conducted a PubMed, Cochrane Library, and company website search for publications using various search terms associated with skin substitutes.Results: Skin substitutes can be categorized as epidermal, dermal, and composite, depending on the skin component they contain, and further split into different categories depending on their composition and source of material, including xenograft, acellular allograft, cellular allograft, autograft, and synthetic skin substitutes. Because there is no ideal option for skin substitutes that meet all the criteria for optimal wound healing, there is ongoing research evaluating and developing different skin substitute options.Conclusion: Our model of skin substitutes was organized based on the different layers of cutaneous involvement and the origin of the product material. We believe that this framework provides a practical guide for selection of the most appropriate skin substitute based on clinical indication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09546634.2018.1530443

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.08.048 · DOI
  2. 10.2165/11538930-000000000-00000 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s40204-014-0030-y · DOI
  4. 10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/cshperspect.a023267 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/iwj.12165 · DOI
  7. 10.1152/physrev.1971.51.4.702 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.burns.2014.08.007 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/jps.21210 · DOI
  10. Pitts SR, 2008, Natl Health Stat Rep, 6, 1
  11. 10.1016/j.emc.2007.01.012 · DOI
  12. 10.1136/emj.2007.052316 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s12245-010-0217-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/ans.13920 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.hcl.2014.02.001 · DOI
  16. 10.1097/00000658-198110000-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1097/00042728-200502000-00007 · DOI
  18. Snyder DL, Sullivan N, Schoelles KM, et al. Skin Substitutes for Treating Chronic Wounds [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); [cited 2012 Dec 18]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK248353/
  19. 10.1111/wrr.12308 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/wrr.12434 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.burns.2006.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Nathoo R, 2014, J Clin Aesthet Dermatol, 7, 44
  23. 10.4103/0970-0358.70712 · DOI
  24. 10.1590/S1983-51752011000400028 · DOI
  25. Alrubaiy L, 2009, Oman Med J, 24, 4
  26. 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_359_16 · DOI
  27. 10.1097/00006534-198212000-00009 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/jbm.b.32689 · DOI
  29. Zelen CM, 2015, Int Wound J, 12, 724, 10.1111/iwj.12395 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1093/jbcr/irx031 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.cps.2009.05.010 · DOI
  32. 10.1272/jnms.81.356 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.suc.2010.08.004 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60644-8 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.2217/17460751.2.6.887 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00609.x · DOI
  37. 10.1159/000321333 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.burns.2012.02.008 · DOI
  39. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000157013.40191.91 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0305-4179(02)00062-1 · DOI
  41. 10.5999/aps.2017.00507 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2004.07.015 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.01.014 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/cup.12925 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jdcr.2016.01.001 · DOI
  46. 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup1.S12 · DOI
  47. 10.1097/00000658-198809000-00008 · DOI
  48. 10.4103/ijps.IJPS_217_17 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02561.x · DOI
  50. 10.2165/00128071-200102050-00005 · DOI
  51. 10.1097/00004630-200103000-00007 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.burns.2008.04.001 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s10561-014-9479-0 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.08.253 · DOI
  55. 10.1097/00004630-199907000-00002 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.bjps.2004.05.003 · DOI
  57. 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03106.x · DOI
  58. 10.1097/00129334-200101000-00016 · DOI
  59. 10.1097/00004630-199701000-00008 · DOI
  60. 10.2337/diacare.19.4.350 · DOI
  61. 10.2337/diacare.26.6.1701 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1097/01.ASW.0000456630.12766.e9 · DOI
  63. 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.3.149 · DOI
  64. Simman R, 2018, Eplasty, 18, e17
  65. 10.1111/iwj.12117 · DOI
  66. Dessy LA, 2013, In Vivo, 27, 153
  67. Caravaggi C, 2011, Wounds: a Compend Clin Res Pract, 23, 228
  68. 10.2337/diacare.26.10.2853 · DOI
  69. Trent JF, 1998, Int J Clin Pract, 52, 408, 10.1111/j.1742-1241.1998.tb08891.x · DOI
  70. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b1ea · DOI
  71. 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08186.x · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1016/S0305-4179(00)00017-6 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819849d6 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318210f3bd · DOI
  75. 10.3390/healthcare2030356 · DOI
  76. Mian M, 1992, Int J Tissue React, 14, 1
  77. 10.12968/hosp.2001.62.2.2379 · DOI
  78. Troy J, 2013, Eplasty, 13, e14
  79. 10.1016/j.burns.2009.03.007 · DOI
  80. 10.1098/rsif.2009.0403 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.048 · DOI
  82. 10.1007/s10856-017-5874-y · DOI
  83. 10.20471/acc.2016.55.02.15 · DOI

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Dai, C., Shih, S., & Khachemoune, A.
Venue
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2020-01-30
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
639-648
ISSN
  • 0954-6634 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1753
DOI
10.1080/09546634.2018.1530443
OpenAlex
W2893185060
Cited by
258
References
1
FWCI
5.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.