The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and moderating roles of work motivation
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore alternative relationships between performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes in the form of self-reported work performance, affective organizational commitment and turnover intention. A cross-sectional survey of 593 employees from 64 Norwegian savings banks showed that performance appraisal satisfaction was directly related to affective commitment and turnover intention. The relationship between performance appraisal satisfaction and work performance, however, was both mediated and moderated by employees' intrinsic work motivation. The form of the moderation revealed a negative relationship for employees with low intrinsic motivation and a positive relationship for those with high intrinsic motivation. Implications for practice and directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 1×
“Similarly, although the relationship between goal setting and performance is moderated by several factors (Locke and Latham, 2002), goal setting theory has proved to be among the most robust and useful theories in organizational science (Neubert, 1998).”
BackgroundKluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
Vallerand, R. J. (1997) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2 · Cited by 3,198 · cited 4×
“Furthermore, due to their strong autonomy orientation and high need for autonomy, intrinsically motivated employees will also be more sensitive to negative experiences associated with external regulation (Ryan and Deci, 2000; Vallerand, 1997).”
BackgroundInfluentialVansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246 · Cited by 1,762
Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/a:1005614228250 · Cited by 1,579 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, since intrinsic motivation is concerned with motivation to perform a task for itself, it is highly related to measures of task involvement or task interest (e.g. Guay et al., 2000).”
BackgroundUnderstanding Self-Report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research
Donaldson, S. I., & Grant-Vallone, E. J. (2002) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1019637632584 · Cited by 1,068
Creating value for employees: investment in employee development
Lee, C. H., & Bruvold, N. T. (2003) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/0958519032000106173 · Cited by 632
Cited by
Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis.
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0035661 · Cited by 1,981
The influence of technology on the future of human resource management
Stone, D. L., Deadrick, D. L., Lukaszewski, K. M., & Johnson, R. (2015) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.002 · Cited by 618
Gillet, N., Gagné, M., Sauvagère, S., & Fouquereau, E. (2013) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2012.665228 · Cited by 295
Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318755303 · Cited by 173
A century of labour turnover research: A systematic literature review
Bolt, E. E. T., Winterton, J., & Cafferkey, K. (2022) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12294 · Cited by 116
HR professionals’ views on work motivation and retention of older workers: A focus group study
Claes, R., & Heymans, M. (2008) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/13620430810860521 · Cited by 92
Garengo, P., Sardi, A., & Nudurupati, S. S. (2022) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-04-2020-0177 · Cited by 85
Keegan, A., & Den Hartog, D. (2019) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12216 · Cited by 47
Kaur, S., & Kaur, G. (2021) · Employee Relations: The International Journal · doi:10.1108/er-05-2020-0216 · Cited by 25
Rahim, A., Ullah Jan, S., Ali, S., Shah, D., & Tahir, M. (2026) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-026-07406-6 · Cited by 1
“This study takes an exploratory approach by using in-depth interviews with senior bank managers and technology of fi cers, and by conducting a review of relevant literature and regulatory documents (Kuvaas 2006; Bozkus Kahyaoglu and Caliyurt 2018; Lee and Bruvold 2019).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuvaas, B.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 504-522
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W2045619815
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 13.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
