Cited by 173Accounting and Organizational ManagementHuman Resource and Talent ManagementManagement Theory and Practice

Putting the System Into Performance Management Systems: A Review and Agenda for Performance Management Research

Schleicher, Deidra J., Baumann, Heidi M., Sullivan, David W., Levy, Paul E., Hargrove, Darel C., Barros-Rivera, Brenda A.·2018·Journal of Management

Abstract

It has been 13 years since the last comprehensive review of the performance management (PM) literature, and a lot has changed in both research and practice in that time. The current review updates (identifying new research directions post 2004) and extends this previous work by creating a systems-based taxonomy and conceptual model of PM. We then use this model to interpret and integrate the extensive work in this area and to identify fruitful and systems-based directions for future PM work. As input to our conclusions, we reviewed the last 36-plus years of PM research (1980–2017) and conducted a comprehensive coding of all empirical PM articles. We offer several specific directions for future PM research, with the ultimate goal of improving PM in practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206318755303

Cites

172 of 172 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional performance management lacks alignment with current business cycles in providing timely feedback.

    “Both academic literature (Levy et al. 2017;Schleicher et al. 2018) and practice-oriented literature (Armitage and Parrey 2013;Buckingham and Goodall 2015;Cappelli and Tavis 2016) emphasizes that traditional performance management lacks to be in line with current business cycles in providing timely feedback.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 174 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Bradley University (US)
  • University of Akron (US)
  • Central Michigan University (US)
Corresponding author
Schleicher, Deidra J.
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2018-02-08
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
2209-2245
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2787319381
Cited by
173
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
FWCI
19.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
Keywords
performance management systems, systems approach, conceptual model, future research directions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review