The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction effects
Abstract
In order to improve our understanding of mediating variables inside the ‘black box’ of the firm's labour management, this paper examines the relationship between high-performance work system (HPWS) practices and employee attitudes. Using a randomly selected, national population sample, clear evidence was found for a positive relationship between HPWS practices and the attitudinal variables of job satisfaction, trust in management, and organizational commitment, implying that HPWS can provide win-win outcomes for employees and employers. However, the study also tests – from an employee perspective – the ‘complementarities thesis’ and finds negative interaction effects among HPWS practices. This strengthens the argument that there are likely to be limits to the positive outcomes of HPWSs for employees. Evidence of sequencing in the employee attitudinal responses to HPWSs was also found, with job satisfaction as the key mediating variable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
HUSELID, M. A. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256741 · Cited by 9,342
The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268 · Cited by 4,623
Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda
Guest, D. E. (1997) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/095851997341630 · Cited by 1,908
Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense?
Green, F. (2004) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.0019-8676.2004.00359.x · Cited by 408
Cited by
Is Disability Disabling in All Workplaces? Workplace Disparities and Corporate Culture
SCHUR, L., KRUSE, D., BLASI, J., & BLANCK, P. (2009) · Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society · doi:10.1111/j.1468-232x.2009.00565.x · Cited by 354
Human resource management, strategic involvement and e-HRM technology
Marler, J. H., & Parry, E. (2016) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2015.1091980 · Cited by 315
Toward a more comprehensive model of firms’ human capital rents
Chadwick, C. (2017) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0385 · Cited by 159
The link between e-HRM use and HRM effectiveness: an empirical study
Obeidat, S. M. (2016) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-04-2015-0111 · Cited by 124
High-performance work systems and school effectiveness: the case of Malaysian secondary schools
Maroufkhani, P., Nourani, M., & Boerhannoeddin, A. B. (2015) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-015-9389-2 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Macky, K., & Boxall, P.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 537-567
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W2033469199
- Cited by
- 640
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 37.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.