Cited by 315Employer Branding and e-HRMHuman Resource and Talent ManagementAI and HR Technologies

Human resource management, strategic involvement and e-HRM technology

Janet H. Marler, Emma Parry·2015·The International Journal of Human Resource Management

Abstract

Associated with the emergence of internet-based human resource management technology is rhetoric predicting that such technological advances (electronic human resource management technology or e-HRM) will make HRM in organizations more strategic. Yet such a prediction is contested in the literature on the role of technology in organizations. Using a large survey data-set consisting of 5665 companies that are located in 32 different countries, we use non-recursive simultaneous equation models with instrumental variables to empirically evaluate competing theoretical perspectives in this literature. We find and show that strategic HR involvement and greater e-HRM capability are both directly and reciprocally related supporting both theoretical perspectives but also showing each is not mutually exclusive. We discuss the implication of these results for human resource management theory, practice and future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1080/09585192.2015.1091980

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marler and Parry (2015) confirmed in their empirical multi-context study that the role of e-HRM in organisations is much more complex than just supporting existing HRM processes.

    “As Marler and Parry (2015) confirmed in their empirical multi-context study, the role of e-HRM in organisations is much more complex than just supporting existing HRM processes”

    From Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016) · cites this paper as Marler and Parry (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marler, J. H., & Parry, E.
Affiliations
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • Cranfield University (GB)
Corresponding author
Janet H. Marler
Venue
The International Journal of Human Resource Management
Published
2015-12-10
Volume
27
Issue
19
Pages
2233-2253
ISSN
  • 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4399
OpenAlex
W2216524154
Cited by
315
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
17.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal of Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
e-HRM, electronic human resource management, strategic human resource management, strategic involvement, bidirectional relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review