Cited by 40Employer Branding and e-HRMHuman Resource and Talent ManagementAI and HR Technologies

E-HR and international HRM: a critical perspective on the discursive framing of e-HR

Open access
Francis, Helen, Parkes, Carole, Reddington, Martin·2014·The International Journal of Human Resource Management

Abstract

In the current global economic climate, international HRM is facing unprecedented pressure to become more innovative, effective and efficient. New discourses are emerging around the application of information technology, with ‘e-HR’ (electronic-enablement of Human Resources), self-service portals and promises of improved services couched as various HR ‘value propositions’. This study explores these issues through our engagement with the emergent stream of ‘critical’ HRM, the broader study of organizational discourse and ethical management theories. We have found that while there is growing research into the take-up of e-HR applications, there is a dearth of investigation into the impact of e-HR on the people involved; in particular, the (re)structuring of social relations between HR functions and line managers in the move away from face-to-face HR support services, to more technology-mediated ‘self-service’ relationships. We undertake a close reading of personal narratives from a multinational organization, deploying a critical discourse lens to examine different dimensions of e-HR and raise questions about the strong technocratic framing of the international language of people management, shaping line manager enactment of e-HR duties. We argue for a more reflexive stance in the conceptualization e-HR, and conclude with a discussion about the theoretical and practical implications of our study, limitations and suggestions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09585192.2013.870309

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a dearth of critique in the literature about the impact on the people involved.

    “As Francis et al. (2014Francis et al. ( , p. 1341) ) note 'there is a dearth of critique in [the] literature about the impact on the people involved'.”

    From Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016) · cites this paper as Francis et al. (2014, p. 1341)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Francis, H., Parkes, C., & Reddington, M.
Affiliations
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
  • Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
Francis, Helen
Venue
The International Journal of Human Resource Management
Published
2014-01-08
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1327-1350
ISSN
  • 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4399
OpenAlex
W1967652257
Cited by
40
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The International Journal of Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion)
  • Winchester Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
Keywords
e-HR, international human resource management, organizational discourse, self-service portal, technocracy, personal narrative, ethical management, reflexivity, multinational organizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review