The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 42 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revitalizing social dialogue in the workplace: the impact of a cooperative industrial relations climate and sustainable HR practices on reducing employee harm
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to unravel the relationship between current forms and realities of social dialogue in the workplace, the industrial relations climate, HRM, and employee harm. We tested a model specifying associations between (1) indicators of revitalized social dialogue, (2) perceived cooperation within the industrial relations climate, (3) perceived sustainability in HR practices, and (4) management perceptions regarding employee harm. The test was based on a survey conducted among 356 (HR-)managers and CEOs in Belgium. The results support the idea that a cooperative industrial relations climate and sustainable HR practices can reduce employee harm. More specifically, efficiency in social dialogue fully mediated the relationship between cooperative industrial climate and employee harm. In turn, industrial relations climate partially mediated the relationship between sustainable HR practices and employee harm. Finally, sustainable HR practices correlated positively with a cooperative industrial relations climate, suggesting that HR and employee relations reinforce rather than weaken each other.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Yet, sustainable HRM research has been conducted largely outside the IR context (De Prins et al., 2018).”
From Advancing the sustainability agenda through strategic human resource management: Insights and suggestions for future research (2023) · cites this paper as De Prins et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 · Cited by 7,806
Kramar, R. (2014) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2013.816863 · Cited by 960
Legge, K. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24156-9 · Cited by 927
Inside the Workplace: First Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey
Kersley, B., Alpin, C., Forth, J., Bryson, A., Bewley, H., Dix, G., & Oxenbridge, S. (2005) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e589592011-001 · Cited by 554
Management paradoxes: A relational view
Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & e Cunha, M. P. (2002) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726702555001 · Cited by 498
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1111/irj.2002.33.issue-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/jan.2012.68.issue-7 · DOI
- De Prins P., 2015, Tijdschrift voor HRM, 12, 1
- 10.5771/0935-9915-2014-4 · DOI
- Eurofound, 2015, Third European Company Survey – Overview report: Workplace practices – Patterns, performance and well-being
- European Commission, 2010, Europe 2020: A Strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth: Communication from the commission
- European Commission, 2015, A new start for social dialogue
- Freeman R. B., 1999, What workers want
- Lucio M. M., 2012, Ten steps for empowering employee representatives in the new European relations, 29
- 10.1111/beer.2008.17.issue-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/bjir.2010.48.issue-2 · DOI
- Van der Brempt, O. (2014). Opening the black box of works council effectiveness: The role of group composition, trust and perceived influence (PhD dissertation). University of Antwerp, Belgium.
- Van Gyes G., 2015, De onderneming is van ons allemaal: de Belgische werknemersinspraak innoveren, 21
- Welz C., 2015, Towards a fresh start for European social Dialogue, 17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–101 of 101
Lapointe, É., & Sunagic, M. (2026) · International journal of human resources management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2026.2719548
Metadata
- Authors
- De Prins, P., Stuer, D., & Gielens, T.
- Affiliations
- Antwerp Management School, Competence Center Next Generation Work, Antwerp, Belgium
- Antwerp Management School (BE)
- ORCID
- Stuer, David
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01-05
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1684-1704
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W2781821023
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 12.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Labor Movements and Unions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- social dialogue, industrial relations climate, sustainable HR practices, employee relations, HR managers, mediation, cooperation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review