Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of therapeutic riding (Sweden)/hippotherapy (United States). A single-subject experimental design study replicated in eleven patients with multiple sclerosis

Hammer, Ann, Nilsagård, Ylva, Forsberg, Anette, Pepa, Helena, Skargren, Elisabeth, Öberg, Birgitta·2005·Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether therapeutic riding (TR, Sweden) hippotherapy (HT, United States) may affect balance, gait, spasticity, functional strength, coordination, pain, self-rated level of muscle tension (SRLMT), activities of daily living (ADL), and health-related quality of life. Eleven patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were studied in a single-subject experimental design iSSED) study, type A-B-A. The intervention comprised ten weekly TR/HT sessions of 30 minutes each. The subjects were measured a maximum of 13 times. Physical tests were: the Berg balance scale, talking a figure of eight, the timed up and go test, 10 m walking, the modified Ashworth scale, the Index of Muscle Function, the Birgitta Lindmark motor assessment, part B, and individual measurements. Self-rated measures were. the Visual Analog Scale for pain, a scale for SRLMT, the Patient-Specific Functional Scale for ADL, and the SF-36. Data were analyzed visually, semi-statistically and considering clinical significance. Results showed improvement for ten subjects in one or more of the variables, particularly balance, and some improvements were also seen in pain, muscle tension, and ADL. Changes in SF-36 were mostly positive, with an improvement in Role-Emotional seen in eight patients. Conclusively, balance and Role-Emotional were the variables most often improved, but TR/HT appeared to benefit the subjects differently.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09593980590911525

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Berg K, 1995, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 27, 27, 10.2340/1650197719952736 · DOI
  2. Berg KO, 1992, Canadian Journal of Public Health, 83, S7
  3. Bertoti DB, 1988, Physical Therapy, 68, 1505, 10.1093/ptj/68.7.1109 · DOI
  4. Biery MJ, 1985, Veterinary clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice, 15, 345, 10.1016/S0195-5616(85)50306-X · DOI
  5. Bohannon RW, 1987, Physical Therapy, 67, 206, 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-X · DOI
  7. 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-245 · DOI
  8. Chatman AB, 1997, Physical Therapy, 77, 820, 10.1093/ptj/77.8.820 · DOI
  9. Domholdt E, 2000, Physical therapy research: principles and applications
  10. 10.1080/140381999443555 · DOI
  11. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE 2002 Physical rehabilitation outcome measures. A guide to enhanced clinical decision making, 2nd edn. Hamilton, Ontario, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  12. 10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90144-8 · DOI
  13. Frändin K, 1995, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 27, 231, 10.2340/16501977231241 · DOI
  14. Fuller KJ, 1996, Clinical Rehabilitation, 10, 195, 10.1177/026921559601000303 · DOI
  15. Heine B, 1997, Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 43, 145, 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60407-5 · DOI
  16. 10.3109/09593989109106962 · DOI
  17. Jones L, 1996, Clinical Rehabilitation, 10, 277, 10.1177/026921559601000403 · DOI
  18. Jønsson A, 1998, Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 10, 75, 10.1615/CritRevPhysRehabilMed.v10.i1.50 · DOI
  19. Ko Ko C, 1999, Clinical Rehabilitation, 13, 33, 10.1191/026921599669648143 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)90035-1 · DOI
  21. 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/sj.sc.3101492 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lindmark B, 1988, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 20, 103
  24. Lord SE, 1998, Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 477, 10.1191/026921598675863454 · DOI
  25. MacKay-Lyons M, 1988, Physiotherapy Canada, 40, 104
  26. MacKinnon JR, 1995, Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 15, 1, 10.1300/J006v15n01_01 · DOI
  27. 10.1212/WNL.53.5.1098 · DOI
  28. Nuyens G, 1994, Clinical Rehabilitation, 8, 286, 10.1177/026921559400800403 · DOI
  29. Ottenbacher KJ, 1986, Strategies for occupational and physical therapists
  30. Pauw J, 2000, Physiotherapy, 86, 523, 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60986-8 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00101-2 · DOI
  32. Riddoch J, 1994, Physiotherapy, 80, 215, 10.1016/S0031-9406(10)61299-0 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/ana.410420318 · DOI
  34. Sköld C 2001 Spasticity – an elusive problem after spinal cord injury. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy, and Elderly Care Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (dissertation)
  35. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00102-4 · DOI
  36. Svensson B, 1994, Physical Therapy, 74, 1017, 10.1093/ptj/74.11.1017 · DOI
  37. Wade DT, 1987, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 19, 25, 10.2340/1650197787192530 · DOI
  38. Westaway MD, 1998, The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 5, 331, 10.2519/jospt.1998.27.5.331 · DOI
  39. 2001, The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hammer, A., Nilsagård, Y., Forsberg, A., Pepa, H., Skargren, E., & Öberg, B.
Venue
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Published
2005-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
51-77
ISSN
  • 0959-3985
  • 1532-5040
Cited by
74
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review