Cited by 73Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationDigital Mental Health Interventions

User Engagement and Clinical Impact of the Manage My Pain App in Patients With Chronic Pain: A Real-World, Multi-site Trial

Open access
Bhatia, Anuj, Kara, Jamal, Janmohamed, Tahir, Prabhu, Atul, Lebovic, Gerald, Katz, Joel, Clarke, Hance·2021·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain imposes a large burden on individuals and society. A patient-centric digital chronic pain management app called Manage My Pain (MMP) can be used to enhance communication between providers and patients and promote self-management. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world engagement of patients in urban and rural settings in Ontario, Canada with the MMP app alongside their standard of care and assess the impact of its usage on clinical outcomes of pain and related mental health. Methods: A total of 246 participants with chronic pain at a rural and 2 urban pain clinics were recruited into this prospective, open-label, exploratory study that compared the use of MMP, a digital health app for pain that incorporates validated questionnaires and provides patients with summarized reports of their progress in combination with standard care (app group), against data entered on paper-based questionnaires (nonapp group). Participants completed validated questionnaires on anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, satisfaction, and daily opioid consumption up to 4.5 months after the initial visit (short-term follow-up) and between 4.5 and 7 months after the initial visit (long-term follow-up). Engagement and clinical outcomes were compared between participants in the two groups. Results: A total of 73.6% (181/246) of the participants agreed to use the app, with 63.4% (111/175) of them using it for at least one month. Individuals who used the app rated lower anxiety (reduction in Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item questionnaire score by 2.10 points, 95% CI –3.96 to –0.24) at short-term follow-up and had a greater reduction in pain catastrophizing (reduction in Pain Catastrophizing Scale score by 5.23 points, 95% CI –9.55 to –0.91) at long-term follow-up relative to patients with pain who did not engage with the MMP app. Conclusions: The use of MMP by patients with chronic pain is associated with engagement and improvements in self-reported anxiety and pain catastrophizing. Further research is required to understand factors that impact continued engagement and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic pain. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04762329; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04762329

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/26528

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings are consistent with previous large randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrating the effectiveness of digital interventions for improving symptoms of depression, anxiety, and pain-related impairment in people with chronic pain.

    “Our findings are consistent with previous large randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that have demonstrated the effectiveness of digital interventions for improving symptoms of depression, anxiety, and even pain-related impairment in people with chronic pain who have been recruited from pain management clinics, primary care clinics, and community/internet referral sources [20,21,45-47].”

    From Digital Mental Health Intervention Plus Usual Care Compared With Usual Care Only and Usual Care Plus In-Person Psychological Counseling for Orthopedic Patients With Symptoms of Depression or Anxiety: Cohort Study (2022) · cites this paper as [45]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhatia, A., Kara, J., Janmohamed, T., Prabhu, A., Lebovic, G., Katz, J., & Clarke, H.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Bhatia, Anuj
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2021-03-04
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
e26528
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135107657
Cited by
73
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University Health Network
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
chronic pain, digital health apps, patient engagement, self-management, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, opioid consumption, patient-provider communication, mental health outcomes
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Humans, Ontario, Prospective Studies, Chronic Pain, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review