Cited by 119Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Obstacles to carrying out brief intervention for heavy drinkers in primary health care: a focus group study

AALTO, MAURI, PEKURI, PETTERI, SEPPÄ, KAIJA·2003·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify possible obstacles to carrying out competent early identification and brief intervention (EIBI) of heavy drinkers in primary health care. Qualitative focus group discussion method study applying the deductive framework approach. Six focus groups involving 18 general practitioners and 19 nurses were recruited from primary health care of the City of Tampere, Finland. Possible obstacles are: (1) confusion regarding the content of early-phase heavy drinking, (2) lack of self-efficacy among primary health care professionals, (3) sense of lacking time needed for carrying out brief intervention, (4) not having simple guidelines for brief intervention, (5) sense of difficulty in identifying of early-phase heavy drinkers, and (6) uncertainty about the justification for initiating discussion on alcohol issues with patients. The main actions to be taken to promote brief intervention are to educate professionals about the content of early-phase heavy drinking and to produce directing, but not excessively demanding guidelines for carrying out EIBI. Probably successful personal experiences carrying out EIBI can improve professionals' self-efficacy and give to them final justification for discussion alcohol issues with their patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09595230100100606

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
AALTO, M., PEKURI, P., & SEPPÄ, K.
Affiliations
Tampere University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
AALTO, MAURI
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
169-173
ISSN
  • 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3362
OpenAlex
W2167679189
Cited by
119
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
brief intervention, heavy drinking, primary care, general practitioners, nurses, implementation barriers, professional self-efficacy, alcohol screening, clinical guidelines, professional education, alcohol use disorder prevention
MeSH terms
Workforce, Alcoholism, Counseling, Female, Finland, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Preventive Health Services, Primary Health Care, Professional Competence, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Brief, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review