CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 54

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reproducibility and validity of a food-frequency questionnaire (NFFQ) to assess food consumption based on the NOVA classification in adults

Dinu, Monica, Bonaccio, Marialaura, Martini, Daniela, Madarena, Maria Pia, Vitale, Marilena, Pagliai, Giuditta, Esposito, Simona, Ferraris, Cinzia, Guglielmetti, Monica, Rosi, Alice, Angelino, Donato·2021·International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition
DOI 10.1080/09637486.2021.1880552
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

NOVA is a classification that divides foods into four groups according to processing. Since no questionnaires have been validated to assess the consumption of foods with different levels of processing in the general adult population, we tested the reliability and validity of a 94-item Food Frequency Questionnaire (NFFQ) designed to estimate the intake (g/day) and the weight ratio (%) of the NOVA food groups in Italian adults. Time reliability and validity were tested by administrating the NFFQ to 110 subjects on two different occasions and comparing it with a weighed dietary record (WDR). Strong correlations between NFFQs ( r > 0.7, p r < 0.7), ICC of 0.536-0.741, and consistent agreement for intake percentages as revealed by Bland-Altman plots indicated moderate to good validity. The NFFQ could be useful for future investigations in this research field.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09637486.2021.1880552

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several 24 h dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaires specifically designed to assess consumption of Nova food groups have been developed.

    “Several 24 h dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaires specifically designed to assess consumption of Nova food groups have been developed 202,206,[208][209][210][211]”

    From Ultra-processed foods and human health: the main thesis and the evidence (2025) · cites this paper as [208]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1038/s41366-020-00650-z · DOI
  2. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/09637486.2017.1412405 · DOI
  4. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003256 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.035 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S1368980017001161 · DOI
  8. 10.3945/ajcn.116.135004 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1186/s13104-020-04944-3 · DOI
  10. 10.3390/nu11061290 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gibney MJ, 2017, Am J Clin Nutr, 106, 717, 10.3945/ajcn.117.160440 · DOI
  12. Goldberg GR, 1991, Eur J Clin Nutr, 45, 569
  13. 10.1073/pnas.4.12.370 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1017/S0029665118002513 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0007114518001046 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1017/S1368980017002853 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801392 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/obr.13146 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.nut.2019.110609 · DOI
  20. Monteiro CA, 2019, Ultra-processed foods, diet quality, and health using the NOVA classification system
  21. 10.1017/S1368980017000234 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.3148/75.1.2014.15 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/jhn.12445 · DOI
  24. 10.1017/S0007114520002688 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.01.004 · DOI
  26. 10.1136/bmj.l1949 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/s41430-020-0632-5 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s00394-018-1870-3 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199754038.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dinu, M., Bonaccio, M., Martini, D., Madarena, M. P., Vitale, M., Pagliai, G., Esposito, S., Ferraris, C., Guglielmetti, M., Rosi, A., & Angelino, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
  • Department of Food, Environmental and Nutritional Sciences (DeFENS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, “Federico II” University of Naples, Italy
  • Human Nutrition and Eating Disorder Research Center, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
  • Human Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
  • Faculty of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2021-02-08
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
861-869
ISSN
  • 0963-7486
  • 1465-3478
DOI
10.1080/09637486.2021.1880552
Cited by
54
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review