Cited by 1,980Body Composition Measurement TechniquesPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsBiomedical and Chemical Research

A biometric study of human basal metabolism

Open access
Harris, J. Arthur, Benedict, Francis G.·1918·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

HARRIS AND BENEDICT tance less than 8ep from the point P, then X and P lie together in a connected sub-set of M every point of which is at a distance of less than e from the point P. The set M is said to be uniformly connected im kleinen if for every positive number e there exists a positive num- ber 68 such that if P1 and P2 are two points of M at a distance apart less than 58 then they lie together in a connected sub-set of M every point of which is at a distance of less than e from P1. Cf.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.4.12.370

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a study of 395 inpatients referred for nutritional support, no single prediction equation was accurate (within 90-110% of measured REE) in the majority of the population.

    “In this study the authors concluded that no single prediction equation was accurate (i.e.within 90e110% of measured REE) in the majority of the population.”

    From ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Abstract identifies the study population as 136 men, 103 women, and 94 newborn infants who were presumably in good health—not 395 inpatients referred for nutritional support. It presents regression equations for predicting basal metabolism but does not report the claimed 90–110% accuracy assessment or conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several factors can influence RMR and the energy expenditure of PA.

    “Several factors can influence RMR and the EE of PA;38, 39, 40”

    From 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities: A third update of the energy costs of human activities (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Abstract identifies age, weight, stature, sex, food intake, and muscular activity as factors relevant to basal metabolism or its measurement. It does not address factors that influence energy expenditure during physical activity, so that part of the sentence is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies consistently note differences in RMR based on age, sex, height, and body weight or body composition and recommend accounting for these factors to estimate RMR when measured RMR values are unavailable.

    “Studies consistently note differences in RMR based on age, sex, height, and body weight or body composition and recommend accounting for these factors to estimate RMR when measured RMR values are unavailable to use as the denominator in computing METs (i.e., relative METs).38,39,42”
  • Kozey et al. have proposed a corrected MET to adjust for individual differences in RMR using the Harris-Benedict RMR equation.

    “Kozey et al.43 have proposed a corrected MET to adjust for individual differences in RMR using the Harris-Benedict RMR equation.38”
  • The 1985 FAO/WHO/UNU approach to the estimation of energy requirements is a refinement of the method first described by Bedale.

    “It is, therefore, of interest to note that the 1985 FAO/WHO/UNU 1 approach to the estimation of energy requirements is a refinement of the method first described by Bedale 12 .”

    From Basal metabolic rate studies in humans: measurement and development of new equations (2005) · cites this paper as [12]

    The paper’s Abstract describes measurements of basal metabolism and equations for predicting daily heat production. A search for Bedale and the 1985 FAO/WHO/UNU approach found no passage addressing whether that approach refined Bedale’s method. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, J. A., & Benedict, F. G.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Institution for Science (US)
  • Nutrition Laboratory and Station for Experimental Evolution, Carnegie Institution of Washington
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1918-12
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
370-373
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2155941545
Cited by
1,980
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 146 · 2023: 151 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 169 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 131 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 70
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
basal metabolic rate, human metabolism, biometric variation, Harris-Benedict equation, metabolic rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review