Cited by 68Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchool Health and Nursing EducationStudent Stress and Coping

University staff experiences of students with mental health problems and their perceptions of staff training needs

Gulliver, Amelia, Farrer, Louise, Bennett, Kylie, Ali, Kathina, Hellsing, Annika, Katruss, Natasha, Griffiths, Kathleen M.·2018·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: University students experience high levels of mental health problems; however, very few seek professional help. Teaching staff within the university are well placed to assist students to seek support. AIMS: To investigate university teaching staff experiences of, and training needs around, assisting students with mental health problems. METHOD: A total of 224 teaching staff at the Australian National University completed an anonymous online survey (16.4% response rate from n ∼ 1370). Data on mental health training needs, and experiences of assisting students with mental health problems were described using tabulation. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Most teaching staff (70.1-82.2%) reported at least moderate confidence in their ability to provide emotional support for students. However, many staff (60.0%) felt under-equipped overall to deal with student mental health problems; almost half (49.6%) reported they did not have access to formal training. Specific actions described in assisting students included referrals, offering support, or consulting others for advice. CONCLUSION: Given the high rates of students who approach staff about mental health problems, there is a critical need to provide and promote both formal mental health response training and explicit guidelines for staff on when, how, and where to refer students for help.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638237.2018.1466042

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gulliver, A., Farrer, L., Bennett, K., Ali, K., Hellsing, A., Katruss, N., & Griffiths, K. M.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Gulliver, Amelia
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2018-05-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
247-256
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2800440397
Cited by
68
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
student mental health, university teaching staff, staff training needs, emotional support for students, staff confidence, student support services
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Faculty, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Staff Development, Students, Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review