Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The social impact of multiple sclerosis - a study of 305 patients and their relatives

A. Hakim, E., Bakheit, A. M. O., Bryant, T. N., Roberts, M. W. H., McIntosh-Michaelis, S. A., Spackman, A. J., Martin, J. P., McLellan, D. L.·2000·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: to assess the effects of multiple sclerosis (MS) on the patients' ability to fulfil their chosen family and social roles and to examine the impact of the disease on their relatives. METHODS: a population-based survey of all known patients with MS and their relatives in Hampshire County, England, between 1986 and 1989. RESULTS: Seventy-four% of the total study population of 411 completed the study. The patients' mean age was 48.3 years (range 19-82) and the mean disease duration was 15.8 years. About 16% of patients were depressed on a mood rating scale and a similar number also exhibited symptoms of anxiety. The marital status of most patients had not changed since the onset of MS but 53% of those who were employed at the time of diagnosis gave up their jobs and the standards of living of 37% of patients and their families had declined as a direct result of the disease. The ability to continue in gainful employment or to maintain social contacts and leisure activities correlated with the course and severity of the disease and cognitive function. Most carers reported symptoms that clearly related to organic pathologies, anxiety and symptoms of depression. The occurrence of these symptoms was associated with disease severity. The professional career of 57% of relatives was also adversely affected by the patient's illness. CONCLUSIONS: MS has a profound impact on the patients' social roles and their relatives' well-being. In contrast to previous studies, a high divorce/separation rate among patients with MS was not observed. Severe disability and cognitive impairment are predictors of loss of employment, decline in the standards of living and withdrawal from social and leisure activities among patients and are strong indicators of stress among relatives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/096382800296755

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
A. Hakim, E., Bakheit, A. M. O., Bryant, T. N., Roberts, M. W. H., McIntosh-Michaelis, S. A., Spackman, A. J., Martin, J. P., & McLellan, D. L.
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2000-01
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
288-293
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2131630839
Cited by
303
References
4
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The social impact of multiple sclerosis - a study of 305 patients and their relatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/096382800296755
The paper
A. Hakim, E., Bakheit, A. M. O., Bryant, T. N., Roberts, M. W. H., McIntosh-Michaelis, S. A., Spackman, A. J., Martin, J. P., & McLellan, D. L. (2000). The social impact of multiple sclerosis - a study of 305 patients and their relatives. Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382800296755

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.