Cited by 295Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Impact of recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis on quality of life, anxiety, depression and distress of patients and partners: Quality of life and emotional well-being in MS

Janssens, A. C. J. W., van Doorn, P. A., de Boer, J. B., van der Meché, F. G. A., Passchier, J., Hintzen, R. Q.·2003·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Studies demonstrating reduced quality of life and psychological well-being in multiple sclerosis (MS) have typically investigated patients within more advanced stages of disease. The aim of the present paper was to evaluate the emotional burden and quality of life of recently diagnosed MS patients and their partners. METHODS: Data on health-related quality of life (SF-36), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and disease-related distress (Impact of Event Scale) were obtained in 101 patients and their partners (n=78). RESULTS: On average 8 months after diagnosis (range 0-24 months), 34% of the patients and 40% of the partners had clinically high levels of anxiety, and 36% of the patients and 24% of the partners had levels of severe distress. Scores of anxiety, depression and distress were higher in patients with more functional limitations (Expanded Disability Status Scale=3.0). Quality of life was significantly poorer in patients compared with controls, particularly among those with higher disability. CONCLUSIONS: Both patients and their partners demonstrated high levels of anxiety and distress in the early period after the diagnosis. These findings indicate careful attention by health care professionals to identify those who may benefit from further psychological support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00166.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janssens, A. C. J. W., van Doorn, P. A., de Boer, J. B., van der Meché, F. G. A., Passchier, J., & Hintzen, R. Q.
Affiliations
Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Published
2003-09-12
Volume
108
Issue
6
Pages
389-395
ISSN
0001-6314 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008654233
Cited by
294
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 17
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, newly diagnosed patients, partners of patients, quality of life, anxiety, depression, psychological distress, emotional burden, disability severity, functional limitations, psychological support
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Data Collection, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review