Cited by 96Physical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

A pilot study of a web-based physical activity motivational program for adults with physical disabilities

kosma, Maria, Cardinal, Bradley J., Mccubbin, Jeffrey A.·2005·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: Develop, deliver, and assess the efficacy of a 4-week web-based leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) motivational program based on the Transtheoretical Model and tailored to inactive adults with physical disabilities. METHOD: This was a pilot-based study incorporating a true experimental design with one treatment and one control group. The intervention program was delivered on the web and was based on the constructs of the Transtheoretical Model. From the 151 individuals who completed the LTPA standardized questionnaire at baseline, 75 people participated in the 1-month post-test assessment. RESULTS: The results of the analysis confirmed the pretest LTPA scores as the study covariate for the post-test assessment (F (1,72)=16.06, p=0.001, (2 )= 0.18). Based on the one-way ANCOVA, there were no statistically significant differences in LTPA scores between the treatment and control groups at post-test. However, the corresponding effect size and variance explained by the treatment approached a moderate level of significance (d=0.34 and (2 )= 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Although conclusive statements about program effectiveness cannot be secured, several 'lessons learned' from this project may be 'key factors' for program improvement. Given the pilot nature of the study and the limited resources for program development and monitoring, continued examination of such motivational materials and delivery mechanisms for people with physical disabilities appear warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638280500242713

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
kosma, M., Cardinal, B. J., & Mccubbin, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
kosma, Maria
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2005-01
Volume
27
Issue
23
Pages
1435-1442
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2157745993
Cited by
96
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
online intervention, exercise motivation, leisure-time physical activity, physical disability, transtheoretical model, health behavior change, adults with disabilities, program development, physical inactivity
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Health Promotion, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Motivation, Pilot Projects, Exercise, Statistics, Nonparametric, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review