Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patients' Depression Treatment Preferences and Initiation, Adherence, and Outcome: A Randomized Primary Care Study

Open access
Raue, Patrick, Schulberg, Herbert, Heo, Moonseong, Klimstra, Sibel, Bruce, Martha·2009·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the association of treatment preferences with treatment initiation, adherence, and clinical outcome among nonsenior adult and senior primary care patients with depression. METHODS: Sixty primary care participants meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression were randomly assigned to receive treatment congruent or incongruent with their primary stated preference. Participants received either 20 weeks of escitalopram, with monitoring by a care manager, or 12 weekly sessions of interpersonal psychotherapy followed by two monthly booster sessions. Adherence to treatment and depression severity were reassessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. RESULTS: Participants expressed stronger preferences for psychotherapy than for antidepressant medication. Preference strength was a more sensitive measure of outcome than was congruence versus incongruence of preference with the assigned treatment. Across age groups, preference strength was significantly associated with treatment initiation and 12-week adherence rate but not with depression severity or remission. CONCLUSIONS: A continuous measure of preference strength may be a more useful measure in clinical practice than preferences per se. Future research should focus on whether and how greater facilitation of the treatment decision-making process between patient and clinician influences clinical outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.60.3.337

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. With Dr., the authors are affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry
  2. 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830100061008 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cooper-Patrick L, 1998, International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 28, 382
  4. Churchill R., 2000, British Journal of General Practice, 50, 905
  5. 10.1001/archpsyc.1975.01760230019001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780040035003 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/BF02599549 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1097/00005650-200109000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1192/bjp.177.4.312 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1136/bmj.322.7289.772 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ten Have T, 2002, National Institute of Mental Health Services Research Conference
  12. Spitzer RL, 1995, Gibbon M
  13. 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Klerman GL, 1984, Interpersonal Psychotherapy of Depression
  16. 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01371-9 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90016-G · DOI · Paper page
  18. Epping-Jordan JA, 2000, WHO Mental Health Bulletin, 6, 5
  19. 10.1192/bjp.176.5.444 · DOI · Paper page
  20. SPSS, 2005, version 14.0
  21. 10.1370/afm.759 · DOI
  22. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00215.x · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s10597-005-9005-8 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Raue, P., Schulberg, H., Heo, M., Klimstra, S., & Bruce, M.
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2009-03-01
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
337-343
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
OpenAlex
W2010314406
Cited by
228
References
8
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patients' Depression Treatment Preferences and Initiation, Adherence, and Outcome: A Randomized Primary Care Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ps.60.3.337
The paper
Raue, P., Schulberg, H., Heo, M., Klimstra, S., & Bruce, M. (2009). Patients' Depression Treatment Preferences and Initiation, Adherence, and Outcome: A Randomized Primary Care Study. Psychiatric Services. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.60.3.337

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.