Cited by 150Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change and Sustainable DevelopmentClimate Change Policy and Economics

The role of scale in integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in cities

Open access
Landauer, Mia, Juhola, Sirkku, Klein, Johannes·2019·Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Abstract

By using a scale framework, we examine how cross-scale interactions influence the implementation of climate adaptation and mitigation actions in different urban sectors. Based on stakeholder interviews and content analysis of strategies and projects relevant to climate adaptation and mitigation in the cities of Copenhagen and Helsinki, we present empirical examples of synergies, conflicts and trade-offs between adaptation and mitigation that are driven by the cross-scale interactions. These examples show that jurisdictional and institutional scales shape the implementation of adaptation and mitigation strategies, projects and tasks at the management scale, creating benefits of integrated solutions, but also challenges. Investigating the linkages between adaptation and mitigation through a scale framework provides new knowledge for urban climate change planning and decision-making. The results increase the understanding of why adaptation and mitigation are sometimes handled as two separate policy areas and also why attempts to integrate the two policies may fail.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Using a scale framework, this paper examines how cross-scale interactions shape the integration of climate adaptation and mitigation in Copenhagen and Helsinki. It finds that jurisdictional and institutional scales influence management-scale implementation, producing both synergies and conflicts or trade-offs, with 11 empirical examples identified.

Key findings

  • Across interviews and policy documents, the authors identified 11 examples of conflicts, synergies, and trade-offs caused by cross-scale interactions in two contexts: urban densification and energy efficiency of buildings (mitigation), and surface runoff and urban heat management (adaptation); 8 examples were in Copenhagen and 3 in Helsinki.
  • Jurisdictional-management and institutional-management interactions can cause trade-offs and conflicts and hinder integration; drivers include differences in perceptions and priorities among local jurisdictions and a limited institutional framework, such as narrow tenders, legal restrictions, and national climate policy priorities.
  • Synergies include Copenhagen building energy efficiency tied to flood protection, green roofs and walls that delay rainwater and reduce air-conditioning needs, the Act on Municipal Cooling Systems, and the HOFOR merger of energy and water services; in Helsinki, Helen Oy’s district heating and cooling system supports energy efficiency while being prepared for extreme weather.
  • Conflicts and trade-offs include Copenhagen groundwater pumps increasing energy demand and measurement difficulties due to landownership; in Helsinki, energy-efficiency requirements have been prioritized over material durability, and adaptation measures requiring physical space compete with densification for mitigation.

Methods

  • Comparative case study of Copenhagen and Helsinki, selected for ambitious climate goals and similar climate risks, size, and institutional settings; populations were about 585,000 in Copenhagen and 613,000 in Helsinki, with carbon-neutral targets by 2025 and 2050 respectively.
  • Semi-structured in-depth interviews with 29 stakeholders (28 face-to-face and 1 via Skype), each approximately one hour, conducted in Helsinki in May, June, and September 2013 (16 organizations) and in Copenhagen in September and October 2013 (10 organizations); interviewees came from public-sector organizations and private-sector organizations, including one local NGO and two consulting companies.
  • Content analysis of policy documents and projects: Helsinki Metropolitan Area Climate Strategy to the Year 2030, Helsinki Metropolitan Area Climate Change Adaptation Strategy, and Kalasatama district; CPH 2025 Climate Plan, CPH Climate Adaptation Plan, and Skt. Kjeld’s district; material was coded with ATLAS.ti 7 using an a priori coding structure and data triangulation.

Limitations

  • Stated: the study is limited to Copenhagen and Helsinki; the authors note the framework could be applied to a larger sample of cities, and a larger variation could allow comparisons between significantly different cities, such as in developing and developed countries.
  • Stated: it is not feasible to analyze all possible scale interactions because there is a plurality of views on how scale and scale interactions can be understood.
  • Evident from the text: the study focuses mainly on the public-sector point of view, and the interviews were conducted in 2013, so the empirical findings reflect that period.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09640568.2018.1430022

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 63 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § 4. Results · p. 9

    Further analysis reveals drivers of conflicts, synergies and trade-offs that can help explain why certain factors along different scales cause challenges for integration of adaptation and mitigation.

    “In addition, further analysis reveals 'drivers' of conflicts, synergies and trade-offs that can help explain why certain factors along different scales cause challenges for integration of adaptation and mitigation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4. Results · p. 9

    Eight of the 11 examples were identified in Copenhagen and three in Helsinki.

    “Eight of these were identified in Copenhagen and three in Helsinki.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 11

    In Copenhagen, two conflicts in the water sector were identified: increasing use of groundwater pumps to avoid flood damage can conflict with mitigation due to increasing energy demand.

    “We identified two conflicts in the water sector, where the Copenhagen adaptation strategy (City of Copenhagen 2011) indicates that in practice, the increasing use of groundwater pumps by the water sector to avoid flood damage can be in conflict with mitigation efforts due to increasing demand for energy (Fig. 4, example 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites City of Copenhagen 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 10

    The Act on Municipal Cooling Systems alleviates this conflict by increasing energy efficiency and alternative air-conditioning.

    “In Copenhagen, the Act on Municipal Cooling Systems (No. 465 of 2008) tries to alleviate this conflict by increasing energy efficiency of buildings and alternative air-conditioning (e.g. district cooling).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Act on Municipal Cooling Systems (No. 465 of 2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data
    § The role of scale in integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in cities · p. 1

    Empirical examples of synergies, conflicts and trade-offs between adaptation and mitigation are driven by cross-scale interactions.

    “Based on stakeholder interviews and content analysis of strategies and projects relevant to climate adaptation and mitigation in the cities of Copenhagen and Helsinki, we present empirical examples of synergies, conflicts and trade-offs between adaptation and mitigation that are driven by the cross-scale interactions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 37
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 10

    A third synergy in Copenhagen: Sankt Kjeld's project district promotes energy improvements and green developments but further improvements are needed.

    “The third synergy was identified in the Sankt Kjeld's project district, related to 'future-proofing' of dwellings. A number of energy improvements and green developments, such as such as solar power cells, passive sun heating and local drainage of rainwater are being promoted but further improvements are needed (The Integrated Urban Renewal in Skt. Kjeld's 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites The Integrated Urban Renewal in Skt. Kjeld's 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 10

    Copenhagen mitigation strategy denotes green roofs can manage rainwater and provide comfortable indoor climate, reducing need for electricity-based cooling.

    “Also, the 'mitigation' strategy of Copenhagen (City of Copenhagen 2012, 10) denotes that when renovating homes, materials such as green roofs, can help manage rainwater and provide more comfortable indoor climate at the same time. This reduces the need to use electricity-based conventional cooling systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites City of Copenhagen 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 10

    The Act on Municipal Cooling Systems (No. 465 of 2008) aims to increase energy efficiency of buildings and reduce use of conventional air-conditioning due to urban heat island effect.

    “The purpose of the Act on Municipal Cooling Systems (No. 465 of 2008) is to increase the energy efficiency of buildings and reduce the use of conventional air-conditioning, due to the urban heat island effect (Fig. 3, example 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Act on Municipal Cooling Systems (No. 465 of 2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 11

    Evaluation was done voluntarily in Kalasatama district as a report by VTT and City Planning Department of Helsinki.

    “This kind of evaluation was done on a voluntary basis as part of the development of Kalasatama district in Helsinki and it took the form of a report (Wahlgren, Kuismanen and Makkonen 2007). The Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) together with the City Planning Department of Helsinki prepared it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wahlgren, Kuismanen and Makkonen 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 10

    The Copenhagen Adaptation Plan mentions green spaces can manage surface runoff and regulate indoor temperatures of buildings.

    “Second, the Copenhagen Adaptation Plan (City of Copenhagen 2011, 58) mentions the potential of green spaces in both surface runoff management and regulating indoor temperatures of buildings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites City of Copenhagen 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4. Results · p. 11

    Landownership appears problematic, leading to difficulties in measuring impacts of adaptation on mitigation and vice versa.

    “Furthermore, an evaluation of measures would be important but here the landownership (property ownership) appears again problematic, leading to difficulties in measuring the impacts of adaptation on mitigation, and vice versa (jurisdictional scale) (Fig. 4, example 2):”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 10

    Building regulations can be applied to keep storm water away from buildings and assure good indoor temperature conditions.

    “It also mentions that building regulations (institutional scale) can be applied to keep storm water away from buildings and assure good indoor temperature conditions in buildings (City of Copenhagen 2011, 77).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites City of Copenhagen 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § The role of scale in integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in cities · p. 1

    Jurisdictional and institutional scales shape the implementation of adaptation and mitigation strategies, projects and tasks at the management scale, creating benefits of integrated solutions but also challenges.

    “These examples show that jurisdictional and institutional scales shape the implementation of adaptation and mitigation strategies, projects and tasks at the management scale, creating benefits of integrated solutions, but also challenges.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 9

    A second synergy in Copenhagen: the mitigation strategy provides a roadmap for energy efficient buildings and states new buildings should cover both adaptation and low energy use.

    “The second synergy was identified as part of the city administration's climate work in Copenhagen, namely the mitigation strategy (City of Copenhagen 2012), which provides an analysis, demonstration and implementation roadmap for energy efficient buildings. The strategy states that new buildings should be constructed so that they cover both climate adaptation and low energy use requirements (Fig.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites City of Copenhagen 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 10

    Sankt Kjeld's project presents synergies of green roofs and green walls delaying water passage to sewer and reducing air-conditioning need.

    “The project Sankt Kjeld's presents examples of the synergies of green roofs and green walls that delay the water's passage to the sewer system during heavy rainfalls and also reduce the need for energy-consuming air-conditioning in the example of the urban heat island effect (The Integrated Urban Renewal in Skt. Kjeld's 2011, City of Copenhagen 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites The Integrated Urban Renewal in Skt. Kjeld's 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites City of Copenhagen 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 11

    Kalasatama smart grid allows testing ground for energy solutions while district accounts for sea level rise and floods in planning and construction.

    “An example of the current situation is that the Kalasatama smart grid system allows a testing ground for smart future energy solutions, and at the same time the district takes into account sea level rise and potential floods in all of its planning and construction, including the smart grid system (SITRA, Tekes and VTT 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SITRA, Tekes and VTT 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § <<Insert Fig. 7>> · p. 17

    Cross-scale interactions hinder the possibilities for integration of adaptation and mitigation.

    “In this study, we present multiple ways how cross-scale interactions directly influence the integration of adaptation and mitigation: they hinder the possibilities for integration, force to make trade-offs between adaptation and mitigation, but sometimes also enhance the integration of adaptation and mitigation by providing synergies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § <<Insert Fig. 7>> · p. 16

    Adaptation has received less attention and is less institutionalized than mitigation in Helsinki.

    “Also, our findings indicate that adaptation has received less attention and is less institutionalized than mitigation in Helsinki, where the latter is still strongly driven by international agreements and steered by national government, as also found by Juhola (2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Juhola (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 11

    The report includes assessment of climate change impacts, adaptation suggestions, and GHG calculations for the district.

    “Based on a draft master plan for the district, the report includes an assessment and evaluation of potential climate change impacts, suggestions for adaptation measures and calculations of greenhouse gas emissions for the district (Wahlgren, Kuismanen and Makkonen 2007) (Fig. 5, example 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wahlgren, Kuismanen and Makkonen 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4. Results · p. 12

    In Helsinki, two instances were found: one trade-off and one synergy where adaptation affects mitigation in surface runoff and urban heat management.

    “We found two instances; one trade-off and one synergy, where adaptation affects mitigation the context of how surface runoff and urban heat management are carried out in Helsinki.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § <<Insert Fig. 7>> · p. 15

    Legal framework is not optimal for integrated solutions in Copenhagen; legislative restrictions affect jurisdictional setting.

    “From the institutional point of view, the legal framework is also not considered optimal for integrated solutions in Copenhagen, and there are legislative restrictions for integration (institutional scale) that affect the jurisdictional setting:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § 4. Results · p. 12

    Helen Oy has been a worldwide pioneer in developing district heating and cooling technologies.

    “This is a common practice of Helen Oy in Helsinki, a city-owned commercial energy provider (Fig. 7, example 1), which has been a worldwide pioneer in developing district heating and cooling (DHC) technologies (Riipinen 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Riipinen 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4. Results · p. 12

    The DHC system in Helsinki was built to increase energy efficiency but also keeps city energy secure and prepared for climate risks.

    “The whole system of DHC plants in Helsinki has been built to increase energy efficiency of the city (mitigation) but at the same time assuring that this system keeps the city energy secure, which also means that the system is prepared for climate risks (adaptation, although not because of a specific adaptation objective but rather energy policy driven), such as from extreme weather events:”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § <<Insert Fig. 7>> · p. 13

    Two drivers emerge: differences in perceptions and priorities, and limited institutional framework to integrate adaptation with mitigation.

    “Based on our analysis, two issues emerge: first, differences in perceptions and priorities how policy implementation should take place, and second, limited institutional framework to integrate adaptation with mitigation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § <<Insert Fig. 7>> · p. 16

    Helsinki implements proactive actions and has operating rules to protect energy supply from extreme weather.

    “Helsinki implements proactive actions and has operating rules in place to protect energy supply (a critical function for energy efficiency) from extreme weather events, such as sea level rise or storm surges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § <<Insert Fig. 7>> · p. 14

    Calls for tenders are sometimes too narrow to invest in both adaptation and mitigation.

    “In terms of investments, calls for tenders are sometimes considered too narrow to invest in both:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    Conflicts can appear when attempts to find integrated solutions for adaptation and mitigation in urban planning fail, or when the two climate policies are implemented in silos.

    “Conflicts, defined by OED (2015) as 'a serious incompatibility between two or more opinions, principles, or interests', can appear when an attempt to find integrated solutions for adaptation and mitigation in urban planning fails, or the two climate policies are implemented in 'silos'”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Walsh et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    Lack of financial resources or competing policy goals of city administrations can hinder policy integration in cities.

    “For example, lack of financial resources or competing policy goals of city administrations can hinder the policy integration in cities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Landauer, Juhola and Söderholm 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    In local urban contexts, adaptation reduces the city's sensitivity to climate risks, while mitigation reduces exposure to climate change impacts.

    “When dealing with climate risks in local urban contexts, adaptation reduces the city's sensitivity, while mitigation reduces to exposure to climate change impacts (Yohe and Strzebek, 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yohe and Strzebek, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    Adaptation and mitigation are complementary, interlinked policy areas.

    “Previous studies have indicated that adaptation and mitigation are complementary, interlinked policy areas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yohe and Strzebek, 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Importance of scale in climate governance · p. 4

    Governance systems are currently unable to address the role that scale interactions might have, leading to inadequate responses to environmental and socio-economic threats such as climate change.

    “It has further been argued that governance systems are currently unable to address the role that the scale interactions might have (Termeer and Dewulf 2014), leading to inadequate responses to environmental and socio-economic threats, such as climate change.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Termeer and Dewulf 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Importance of scale in climate governance · p. 4

    The concept of scale and its implications has been an understudied area, particularly in social sciences, and is a persistent issue of conceptual ambiguity and imprecision.

    “Despite this interest, it is argued that the concept of scale itself and its implications has been an understudied area, in social sciences in particular (Gibson et al. 2000, Padt et al. 2014) and a persistent issue of conceptual ambiguity and imprecision (Padt and Arts, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gibson et al. 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Padt et al. 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Padt and Arts, 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction · p. 2

    Differences in policy objectives across multiple scales are a reason for the dichotomy between adaptation and mitigation when these policies are implemented.

    “Differences in policy objectives across multiple scales have been frequently noted as a reason for the dichotomy between adaptation and mitigation when these two policies are being implemented (Goklany 2007, Biesbroek, Swart and van der Knaap Wim 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Goklany 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Biesbroek, Swart and van der Knaap Wim 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § The role of scale in integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in cities · p. 1

    The results increase understanding of why adaptation and mitigation are sometimes handled as two separate policy areas and why attempts to integrate the two policies may fail.

    “The results increase the understanding of why adaptation and mitigation are sometimes handled as two separate policy areas and also why attempts to integrate the two policies may fail.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 2.2. Cross-scale interaction · p. 6

    The two case cities, Copenhagen and Helsinki, are fairly similar with respect to climate risks, size of the cities, and institutional settings.

    “Thus, the two case cities are fairly similar with respect to climate risks, size of the cities, and institutional settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Importance of scale in climate governance · p. 4

    Greenhouse gases have a long residence time in the atmosphere and the benefits of mitigation will be evidenced after several decades, although co-benefits such as air pollution reduction can be observed in the short run.

    “Additionally, considering the temporal scale, greenhouse gases have a long residence time in the atmosphere and the benefits of mitigation will be evidenced after several decades, although co-benefits such as air pollution reduction can be observed in the short run.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IPCC 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 2.2. Cross-scale interaction · p. 7

    The coding structure for the qualitative analysis was developed a priori.

    “The coding structure was developed a priori.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2. Cross-scale interaction · p. 7

    In both Copenhagen and Helsinki, climate objectives and motivation are not solely the result of national or international requirements (top-down); these cities have been very active in initiating and developing their own climate agendas and are part of some climate networks (bottom-up).

    “In both Copenhagen and Helsinki, the climate objectives and motivation are not solely the result of national or international requirements (top-down), but these cities have been very active in initiating and developing their own climate agendas, and are part of some climate networks (bottom-up), such as many other cities (see Bulkeley 2005, Bulkeley and Betsill 2005, Betsill and Bulke”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bulkeley 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bulkeley and Betsill 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Betsill and Bulkeley 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Importance of scale in climate governance · p. 4

    In many Nordic cities, implementation of climate change related measures happens within the framework of national policy and regulations, a trend also observed elsewhere.

    “Nevertheless, in many Nordic cities the implementation of climate change related measures happens within the framework of national policy and regulations, a trend also observed elsewhere (cf. Jordan, Wurzel, and Zito 2005, Peters 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jordan, Wurzel, and Zito 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Peters 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Importance of scale in climate governance · p. 4

    Climate change initiatives of city networks can drive local adaptation and bypass the state, making cities 'translocal sites' rather than a level embedded in a hierarchical structure of city and state.

    “This means that climate change initiatives of city networks can drive local adaptation and bypass the state. This makes cities to 'translocal sites' rather than a level embedded in a hierarchical structure of city and state (Bulkeley 2005, p. 887, Bulkeley and Betsill 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bulkeley 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bulkeley and Betsill 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 2.2. Cross-scale interaction · p. 7

    The audio-recordings of interviews were transcribed and the responses were verified.

    “The audio-recordings were transcribed and responses verified (following Guion, Diehl, and McDonald 2011, 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guion, Diehl, and McDonald 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Importance of scale in climate governance · p. 4

    Adaptation actions are mainly beneficial at the local level; adaptation measures can reduce vulnerability to climate variability in the long term, but their effectiveness can become visible immediately.

    “Considering the spatial scale, adaptation actions are mainly beneficial at the local level. Adaptation measures can reduce vulnerability to climate variability in the long term also, but the effectiveness of adaptation measures can become 'visible' immediately (IPCC 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IPCC 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § 2.2. Cross-scale interaction · p. 7

    The interview question format was open-ended and an interview guide helped the interviewers focus on key topics, maintain consistency, and stay on track.

    “The interview question format was open-ended and an interview guide helped the interviewers to focus on the key topics, to maintain consistency, and to 'stay on track'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4. Results · p. 9

    The Copenhagen adaptation strategy ties together energy efficiency and flood protection legal requirements and reveals how synergies can be created.

    “Thus, the Copenhagen's adaptation strategy ties together the two otherwise unrelated legal requirements for energy efficiency and flood protection and reveals how synergies can be created.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Importance of scale in climate governance · p. 4

    Mitigation efforts are mainly a global responsibility and provide global benefits.

    “For example, IPCC (2007) states that mitigation efforts are mainly a global responsibility and provide global benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IPCC 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2. Cross-scale interaction · p. 7

    Mitigation is still quite often better institutionalized than adaptation.

    “Although mitigation is still quite often better institutionalized than adaptation (cf. Anguelowski and Carmen 2011), especially Copenhagen is investing heavily in adaptation actions, partially due to the past flood events, such as a cloudburst event in 2011.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anguelowski and Carmen 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Importance of scale in climate governance · p. 4

    Cities across the world are now managing both climate adaptation and mitigation to prepare for risks and impacts with their own initiatives and by means of networks such as the Cities for Climate Protection (CCP).

    “Cities across the world are now managing both climate adaptation and mitigation to prepare for risks and impacts (Rosenzweig et al. 2017 in press ) with their own initiatives and by means of networks, such as the Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) (Betsill and Bulkeley 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Rosenzweig et al. 2017 in press

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Betsill and Bulkeley 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1. Importance of scale in climate governance · p. 4

    Implementation of climate change measures in Nordic cities often takes place without proper coordination or available resources from the state, and would still quite often require state involvement and public policy-making.

    “However, this often takes place without proper coordination or available resources from the state for adaptation and mitigation and their implementation would still quite often require state involvement and public policy-making (Juhola and Westerhoff 2011, Dannevik, Rauken, and Hovelsrud 2012, Dymén and Langlais 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Juhola and Westerhoff 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dannevik, Rauken, and Hovelsrud 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Dymén and Langlais 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § <<Insert Fig. 7>> · p. 17

    The combination of interviews and policy document analysis was useful in identifying scale interactions.

    “We found the combination of interviews and policy document analysis useful in identifying scale interactions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § <<Insert Fig. 7>> · p. 17

    Application of the scale framework improves understanding of the inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation.

    “Application of this scale framework improves understanding of the inter-relationships between adaptation and mitigation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § <<Insert Fig. 7>> · p. 13

    These different perceptions drive conflict and hinder integrated action.

    “These different perceptions 'drive' a conflict on the ground, while hindering such an integrated action to be implemented, and instead, could support an alternative option to be realized, which is only beneficial for one of the two policy objectives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6. Conclusion · p. 17

    An empirical examination of linkages between adaptation and mitigation through the scale framework provides new knowledge for urban climate change planning and decision-making to better understand the scales at which the two climate policies overlap, interplay and influence the decisions and practices of adaptation and mitigation.

    “Based on the findings, we conclude that an empirical examination of linkages between adaptation and mitigation through the scale framework provides new knowledge for urban climate change planning and decision-making to better understand the scales at which the two climate policies overlap, interplay and influence the decisions and practices of adaptation and mitigation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The public sector still plays an important role in implementing climate policies and practices in Nordic countries.

    “Understanding the role of public sector is important because the public sector still plays an important role in implementing climate policies and practices in Nordic countries.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The translation of global climate policies into regional and local level management practices is not a straightforward process.

    “However, the translation of global climate policies into regional and local level management practices is not a straightforward process.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synergies have been discovered in Copenhagen between energy efficiency and flood protection criteria for building design.

    “Synergies have been discovered in Copenhagen between energy efficiency and flood protection criteria for building design.”

    From Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review (2022) · cites this paper as Landauer et al. 2018

  • In Copenhagen, a higher capacity of groundwater pumps was necessary to regulate floodwater, resulting in increased energy consumption.

    “Furthermore, the study discovered a contradiction in which a higher capacity of groundwater pumps was necessary to regulate floodwater, resulting in increased energy consumption.”

    From Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review (2022) · cites this paper as Landauer et al. 2018

  • In Helsinki, strong national policies on energy-efficient building design compelled municipal governments to prioritize mitigation measures such as building insulation over adaptation measures such as using durable materials to safeguard buildings from flooding.

    “In Helsinki, strong national policies on energy-efficient building design compelled municipal governments to prioritize mitigation measures such as building insulation over adaptation measures such as using durable materials to safeguard buildings from flooding.”

    From Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review (2022) · cites this paper as Landauer et al. 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Second empirical context names adaptation twice

    Minor

    The methods section describes the second context as adaptation affecting adaptation, but the empirical analysis identifies it as adaptation affecting mitigation.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Bache I., 2005, Paper prepared for the EUSA 9th Biennial Conference in Austin
  2. Helsingin kaupunkisuunnitteluvirasto, 2008, Sörnäistenrannan ja Hermanninrannan osayleiskaava. Osayleiskaavan selostus. Helsingin kaupunkisuunnitteluviraston julkaisuja 2008:11
  3. HSY, 2010, Pääkaupunkiseudun ilmasto muuttuu. Sopeutumisstrategian taustaselvityksiä
  4. Hughes, S., E. K. Chu, and S. G. Mason. 2018. “Introduction”. In Climate Change in Cities: Innovations in Multi-Level Governance , edited by S. Hughes, E. K. Chu, and S. G. Mason, 1–15. Cham: Springer.
  5. Klein R. J. T., 2007, Climate Change 2007 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, 745
  6. Klein J., 2016, Environment and Planning C, 35, 1055
  7. Leonardsen L., 2009, Paper presented at the International Symposium Strategies for Adapting to Climate Change in the Regions of Europe
  8. Longhurst R., 2010, Key Methods in Geography, 117
  9. OED. 2018. “Oxford Living Dictionaries.” Online English Dictionary. Accessed January 31, 2018. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/conflict
  10. Ostrom E., 2010, Solutions, 1, 27
  11. Riipinen M., 2013, International Energy Agency CHP/DHC Collaborative and Clean Energy.
  12. Wahlgren I., 2007, Sörnäistenranta-Hermanninranta-osayleiskaava - ilmastonmuutoksen huomioonottaminen

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landauer, M., Juhola, S., & Klein, J.
Affiliations
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Geological Survey of Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Landauer, Mia
Venue
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Published
2018-04-03
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
741-765
ISSN
  • 0964-0568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0559
OpenAlex
W2783728736
Cited by
149
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • LaCRIS (University of Lapland) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Norden Top-level Research Initiative sub-programme ‘Effect Studies and Adaptation to Climate Change’.
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation, cross-scale interactions, urban climate policy, institutional scale, urban climate planning, Copenhagen, Helsinki, stakeholder perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review