Cited by 692Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Levels of processing: Past, present... and future?

Craik, Fergus I.M.·2002·Memory

Abstract

In this article I first briefly survey some enduring legacies of the Craik and Lockhart (1972) article on levels of processing (LOP) and address some common criticisms. In the next section I discuss whether memory can be regarded as "pure processing", the role of short-term memory in an LOP framework, measurement of "depth" in LOP, encoding-retrieval interactions, the concept of consolidation, and the reality of "levels" of processing. In the final section I offer some speculations on future directions, discussing the notion of levels of representation and a possible continuing role for LOP in memory research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658210244000135

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Safe, harmless subjects only feebly stimulate the cognitive engagement important to durable learning.

    “Likewise, safe, ' harmless ' subjects (Akbari, 2008a, p. 281) only feebly stimulate the cognitive engagement that is so important to durable learning (see, for example, Craik, 2002; Tomlinson, 2012).”

    From The Global ELT coursebook: A case of Cinderella's slipper? (2022) · cites this paper as Craik, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craik, F. I. M.
Affiliations
Rotman Research Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Craik, Fergus I.M.
Venue
Memory
Published
2002-09
Volume
10
Issue
5-6
Pages
305-318
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2018434576
Cited by
692
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 39
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
levels of processing, short-term memory, memory consolidation, levels of representation, memory studies
MeSH terms
Forecasting, Humans, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychology, Psychology, Experimental, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review