Cited by 4Psychedelics and Drug StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Psychoanalyst attitudes towards psychedelic-assisted therapy

Kraiem, Eli, Diener, Marc, Guss, Jeffrey, Mavrides, Linnea, Saban, Sally·2025·Drugs Education Prevention and Policy

Abstract

Background Numerous clinical trials have supported psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) as a treatment for psychiatric disorders such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and substance use. While empirical evidence indicates PAT’s benefits, the perspectives of mental health practitioners on this topic remain unclear.Methods This quantitative study attempted to capture psychoanalyst practitioners’ attitudes toward PAT. A sample of 130 graduate-level trained psychoanalysts in at least part-time clinical practice was recruited to participate in an online survey.Results The study found that psychoanalysts were cautiously supportive of PAT, open to their clients engaging in PAT, and optimistic about PAT’s potential in treating mental disorders. Additionally, they reported that PAT would be ineffective in treating substance use disorders (SUDs). Lastly, participants who reported a history of psychedelic use were significantly more likely to have greater positive attitudes toward PAT than those who had not.Conclusion Results indicate the potential for misinformation about psychedelics and a lingering cultural stigma regarding the utility of psychedelics in the therapeutic environment among psychoanalysts. Therefore, education on the risks, potential benefits, and limitations of the evidence base of psychedelics and their effectiveness across psychiatric disorders appears warranted in the psychoanalytic community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09687637.2024.2359444

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kraiem, E., Diener, M., Guss, J., Mavrides, L., & Saban, S.
Affiliations
  • Long Island University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
Corresponding author
Kraiem, Eli
Venue
Drugs Education Prevention and Policy
Published
2024-06-04
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
449-460
ISSN
  • 0968-7637 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3370
OpenAlex
W4399332960
Cited by
4
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Drugs Education Prevention and Policy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
psychedelic therapy, psychoanalytic community, substance use disorders, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, psychoanalytic training, practitioner perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review