The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Skin, Tooth, and Bone – The Basis of Movement is Our People: A Disability Justice Primer
Open accessAbstract
Skin, Tooth, and Bone by Sins Invalid (2016) is a snappy, accessible, yet challenging 70-page long booklet by multiple authors, all part of the Sins Invalid performance arts collective, based in Sa...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, empowering technology at the community level would enhance visibility and engagement, foster solidarity, collective access, resource sharing, and self-determined interdependence among individuals, in line with the concept of networked empowerment [3] and Disability Justice [12, 39, 62].”
From Rethinking “Empowering Technology” in Higher Education Accessibility: A Case Study of Disabled Students’ Experiences at a German University (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K. (2019) · Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience · doi:10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607 · Cited by 461
Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design
Bennett, C. L., Brady, E., & Branham, S. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3234695.3236348 · Cited by 493
#SaytheWord: A disability culture commentary on the erasure of “disability”.
Andrews, E. E., Forber‐Pratt, A. J., Mona, L. R., Lund, E. M., Pilarski, C. R., & Balter, R. (2019) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/rep0000258 · Cited by 247
Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design
Hofmann, M., Kasnitz, D., Mankoff, J., & Bennett, C. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3373625.3416996 · Cited by 200
Disability, Urban Health Equity, and the Coronavirus Pandemic: Promoting Cities for All
Pineda, V. S., & Corburn, J. (2020) · Journal of Urban Health · doi:10.1007/s11524-020-00437-7 · Cited by 156
Metadata
- Authors
- Invalid, S.
- Affiliations
- Myroslava Tataryn, Ottawa, Canada
- Corresponding author
- Invalid, Sins
- ORCID
- Invalid, Sins
- Venue
- Reproductive Health Matters
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-06-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 149-150
- ISSN
- 0968-8080 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9576
- OpenAlex
- W2730740198
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reproductive Health Matters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Theatre and Performance Studies
- Keywords
- disability justice, performance art, disability activism, reproductive rights, bodily autonomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
